My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-06 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2006
>
07-10-06 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2007 4:50:00 PM
Creation date
12/7/2007 4:49:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Counci - Date
7/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING JULY, 10, 2006 <br />7/10/06 <br />To the Members of the South Bend Common Council <br />President Timothy Rouse wrote an editorial that appeared in the South Bend Tribune on <br />July 9, 2006. In that editorial, he questioned the validity of recent survey findings <br />showing that 79% of Hoosiers agree that lesbians and gay men “deserve the same civil <br />rights protections as everyone else.” I’m sorry I can’t be there in person to respond to Mr. <br />Rouse’s concerns, but I am currently in Baltimore at a professional conference. I’d like <br />to assure the members of the Common Council that the data from the 2005 Indiana Poll <br />are trustworthy and reliable. I have two main points to make. <br />The first point I want to make concerns the fairness of the questions. Mr. Rouse infers <br />that because I study the gay rights movement, the survey questions I designed might be <br />biased or at least might be perceived to be biased. Survey researchers like me worry <br />about biased questions all the time. Because bad questions give us useless answers. <br />That’s why we test questions ahead of time to make sure they are fair, and we use <br />questions for earlier surveys so we can compare results. The 2005 Indiana Poll used <br />questions that had been field tested in a variety of other surveys, making only minor <br />changes, such as using the word “Hoosiers” instead of the work “Americans.” <br />It’s not surprising, then, that the results of the 2005 Indiana Poll look very similar to <br />findings from other surveys. The overwhelming majority of Americans believe that <br />lesbians and gay men should be included in civil rights laws. For example, the 2004 <br />National Election Study found that 80% of Americans favored laws to protect lesbians <br />and gay men against job discrimination. The National Election Study is one of the most <br />respected and long-running surveys of American opinion in the nation; it is the standard <br />against which other public opinion surveys are measured. <br />The second point I want to make concerns the number of people that were surveyed. Mr. <br />Rouse infers that because we surveyed “only” 504 adult Hoosiers, our findings do not <br />offer a true picture of actual public opinion. This is a common misperception. The 2005 <br />Indian Poll surveyed a random subset of Hoosiers men and women, old and young, black <br />and white, Republican and Democrat who look like the rest of the state. This technique <br />allows researchers to gauge overall public opinion very accurately, even when only a <br />relatively small number of people are interviewed. In fact, the National Election Study <br />can measure the attitudes of over 200 million people by interviewing only 2,000 people. <br />In sum, the findings of this recent survey are real and they are credible. Four out of five <br />Hoosiers believe that lesbians and gay men deserve the same civil rights protections as <br />everybody else. <br />Yours truly, <br />Ellen Ann Andersen <br />Associate Professor of Political Science <br />Catherine Pittman, 2628 Summit Ridge, South Bend, Indiana, passed out two handouts, <br />1. South Bend Equality – Petitions; 2. No Special Rights.net, petition. She stated that the <br />Human Rights Commission has indeed made a statement that they recognize that <br />discrimination is occurring against GLBT individuals and that they have asked the South <br />Bend Common Council to find a remedy to this.They wanted it to be investigated and <br />find a remedy to be found. It has been over a year ago, that they made that request and it <br />is in writing. Also, because only two cases have been reported of GLBT discrimination, <br />GLBT individuals no that there is no recourse for them when they go the Human Rights <br />Commission, so it underestimates the number of people who would come if they new that <br />there was recourse, that someone would be able to listen to them. She talked about some <br />of the petitions that the Council may have seen circulating around. Mr. Mangan’s group <br />has done a good job of trying to confuse this issue. There have been presentations on all <br />kinds of irrelevant issues in this Council Room. In a similar manner, the petition that his <br />group has circulated raises all kinds of irrelevant issues.The petition mentions same sex <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.