' - �'��'`�
<br /> REGUI,:1R �,?�TITdG
<br /> AUGUST 22, 1932
<br /> R�bular meeting held by the Board of Public Sa�ety ;`onday,
<br /> A��ust 22, 1932�
<br /> 1�,'�eting called to order at 9 :A.?.�• Those in attendance �vere
<br />� . _
<br /> C. �'�. Budd, V. J. Ga,dacz, "J. �I. Trost, Jr.
<br /> T:"inutes of last reo lar meetin; read and a.pproved.
<br />� . FOI,IG'� D�PARTI:".�T�1T
<br /> On motion of T'r. Trost, seconded by I"r. Cxadacz, and unanimously
<br /> c�rried, the resibnation of Officer George Pinter ��as accepted
<br /> ef�ective 1'�ugust 18, 1932.
<br /> Chief I�uespert informed the Boasd that Officer Jos. �embars�etiaski �s
<br /> probation period expires �u�ust 23, 1932 , and recommends him
<br /> for second class officer. T,�otion �aas then nl�.de by i'r. Gadacz,
<br /> seconded by ?:�r. Trost, and unanimously carried, that recomrnen-
<br />� dation be accepted.
<br /> I ?;'onthly report oi Police Depaxtment v�as presented, examined and
<br />' ordered placed on �ile. j
<br /> Requisitions approved ari.d bills ordered paid.
<br /> i
<br />� At thi s time the Board announced i t ��aas ready to proceed v�i th '
<br /> i the trials of Poli ce Of�ic ers Julius DeRose, Claud E. Blake., and
<br /> ' Faul Polinski.
<br /> Zhe char�es against the officers filed ��aith the Board, together
<br /> �� ith notice and proof of service there-of being as folloti�s:
<br /> (H. I. ) . Y.�r. �. G. Graham appeared for the respondants and
<br /> �Raived readin; of charges and proof of service of notiee and
<br /> I � sked to proceed tirith the trial.
<br /> ' Fy agreemen.t of parties, the trials of the above na.med res�on- !
<br /> �ants ��ere held together. ',Vitnesses vrho testified ���ere
<br /> ora.ce 2". Hamilton, Asst Chief of Police; Arthur ',lalsh and i
<br /> Cfficers Julius DeRose, Paul Polinski and Claud L. Blake txho !
<br /> Y.avin� been placed under oath gave testimony in response to �,
<br /> cuestions asked by City ��ttorney, `:'lalter Z. Clem.ents, ?.`embers
<br /> cf the Board and T'r. Graham. `"ihe officers having been giYen
<br /> �n o�portunity to testify regardin�; the charges filed against
<br /> ,hem� they adMi�ted' havfn� aecepted gifts from l�rthur '.7alsh'.
<br /> ;aho ��as then under �r'rest and a�vaiting trial. The hearing being
<br /> c;oncluded, the Board announced that it vrould take the matter
<br /> itnder advisement. .
<br /> ; �'he chasges a:;ainst �fficer Frank �oloszar filed ��ith the Board,
<br /> � ��ogether tivith notics and proof of service thereo�' being as
<br /> ' _'ollo���ns: (H. I. ) . I.ir. Jos. Hemphlin,�„ r�ttorney for Offi cer
<br /> r�aloszar, ��raived reading of cY�arges and proof of service of
<br /> iiotice and asked to proceed �F�ith the trial.
<br /> I
<br /> j !�t thi s point, T'r. Hemphlin� made the f olla,n in� verbal mo ti on;
<br /> I " The respondant, �'rank Iioloszar, �zoves the Board of
<br /> II Public Safety to require the c'omplainin; �vitness to
<br /> � elect bet�veen eounts or paragraphs 1 and 2, a,nd count
<br /> � number 3 on the �round that counts 1 and 2 are eon-
<br /> trary to count number 3 in as much as counts 1 and 2
<br /> charges the respondant �vith taking and retainin,� for
<br /> his person.al use 2 cartons of cigarettes; 2 decks of
<br /> playin� eards and a auantity of razor blades� the
<br /> property of �rthur ''lalsh of South Be�1d, Indiaiza, and
<br /> that count number 3 char�es sa.id respondant �aith
<br /> receivin� and acceptin� from �'�rthur ".lalsh 2 ea.rtons
<br /> o�' cigare�ttes , 2 decys of �laying cards and a c?uantity
<br /> i
<br /> of razor blades.�'
<br /> - - - , � �
<br />
|