My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-11 Common Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2011
>
03-28-11 Common Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2011 9:47:40 AM
Creation date
4/14/2011 9:47:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 28, 2011 <br /> Mr. Gary Gilot, Director, Public Works, 13th Floor County-City Building, 227 W. <br /> Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana, advised that the Triangle Development project is a <br /> construction project defined as 55-60 residential properties, 70% at market rate pricing <br /> and 30% affordable pricing. The appropriated funds will be used to pay for the public <br /> infrastructure improvements including roads, curbs, sidewalks, street lamps, sewer lines, <br /> etc., per the approved architectural and project design. The original appropriation of$5.3 <br /> million was segmented to include $4.1 million related to Eddy Street Commons and $1.2 <br /> million to the Triangle Development. Monies appropriated for the Triangle Development <br /> were never expended, due to project delays resulting from property acquisition delays. <br /> The City let the appropriation expire at the end of 2009. Now, the City desires to <br /> recommence the Triangle Development project at this time and therefore, request to <br /> appropriate $2.4 million, $2.0 million in Major Moves Fund #412 and $0.4 million in <br /> Sewer Capital Fund #642. Mr. Gilot proposed a friendly amendment as per prior <br /> discussion a new Section IV. to read as follow: The Common Council appropriates these <br /> funds contingent on the Administration not awarding construction contracts until there is <br /> firm evidence of demand for lots to build housing in the Triangle subdivision. This <br /> evidence of demands shall be met when 25 lots are held by 25% deposits on the value of <br /> the lots. It is understood these are refundable deposits if the project does not go forward. <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis asked Council Attorney Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand her <br /> opinion on the friendly amendment. <br /> Council Attorney Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand advised that the amendment Mr. Gilot read <br /> into the record be new Section IV. and to amend Section V. to read as follows: This <br /> Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Common <br /> Council and approval by the Mayor, and upon the conditions set forth in Section IV being <br /> met. <br /> City Clerk John Voorde read into the record the amendment: New Section IV. to read as <br /> follow: The Common Council appropriates these funds contingent on the Administration <br /> not awarding construction contracts until there is firm evidence of demand for lots to <br /> build housing in the Triangle subdivision. This evidence of demands shall be met when <br /> 25 lots are held by 25% deposits on the value of the lots. It is understood these are <br /> refundable deposits if the project does not go forward. <br /> Council Attorney read into the record the new Section V. as follows: This Ordinance <br /> shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Common Council and <br /> approval by the Mayor, and upon the conditions set forth in Section IV being met. <br /> Councilmember Henry Davis asked if the Board of Public Works would then return to the <br /> Council to give a report when these measures have been met. <br /> Mr. Gilot advised that the Board of Works could send a letter to the City Clerk or to the <br /> President of the Council or both. <br /> Councilmember Henry Davis stated that why he is asking is because there is another <br /> piece to this, the project labor agreement being attached to this public works project not <br /> the private sector work that is going to be done. He stated that he would like to see some <br /> language or a commitment to a project labor agreement. He stated that he is sure that <br /> everyone is not opposed to having local jobs for local people. <br /> Mr. Gilot stated that a local resident worker clause without a PLA(Project Labor <br /> Agreement.) <br /> Councilmember Henry Davis stated that they would get more out of it with a Project <br /> Labor Agreement. <br /> Mr. Gilot stated that he doesn't think so. <br /> Councilmember Henry Davis asked Mr. Gilot to explain. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.