06-25-18 Zoning and Annexation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

®CITY OF SOUTH BEND I OFFICE OF THE CLERK conversation about making sure we are providing some diversity and other types of institutions and operations? With this particular one (1)I have concern about the combination. I don't know if that is too much to go on at that site. I am heavily considering the recommendation from the Area Plan Commission. What is the best use in looking forward? Committee Chair Davis stated, I would like for us to look at the whole plan. That has been sitting there for a long period of time. I have a hard time, even when we first saw the plan and it has not been done. We need to look at that because it causes zoning problems. We should not wait till Mr. Feenie comes in here to deal with these kinds of things. It just creates conflict. I do appreciate DCI's opinion both ways. I suggest you do that even in the future. I like that. You have helped guide us both ways. Committeemember Broden asked, What is a legal non-conforming use? Secondly, are there any other main corridors? When I look at them there really isn't much of a difference to me. I can't square, if this is a major corridor, saying tinker all you want and that is fine, but if you are ready to go, hold on. It really isn't that much different from the special exceptions in Local Business. I assume the market, at some time, will adjust. It should and can help with that. So that is one (1) thing,you have a major corridor.Where would we put these?And then my second point is squaring this with the existing vision that is not approved for that neighborhood. What the Area Plan saw and what we saw as Council was that plan being referenced. How do I square referencing something that has been approved? I'm feeling we have a lot of conflicting information. Committee Chair Davis asked, How long do we have to take action on this? Council Attorney Bob Palmer replied, You have until August 8th, 2018. Committee Chair Davis then opened the floor to members of the public wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to the legislation. There were none. He then turned the floor back to the Committee for further comment or main motion. Committeemember Ferlic made a motion to send Bill No 14-18 to the full Council with no recommendation. Committeemember Voorde seconded this motion which carried by a voice vote of three (3) ayes and one (1) nay (Committeemember Broden). With no further business, Committee Chair Davis adjourned the Zoning and Annexation Committee meeting at 5:50 p.m. Re pvis, Committee > Chair i EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT 455 County-City Building 227W.Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana 46601 p574.235.9221 f574.235.9173':TTD574.235.55671www.southbendin.gov 9