My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-18 PARC
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2018
>
PARC (Parks, Arts, Recreation and Culture)
>
06-25-18 PARC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2018 8:57:50 AM
Creation date
7/10/2018 8:57:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
6/25/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I®CITY OF SOUTH BEND I OFFICE OF THE CLERK <br /> species list as a do not plant and highly invasive tree. Fifty-seven percent(57%) of the species we <br /> were recommending be planted in South Bend are not native to North America. That is troubling <br /> from an ecological standpoint. <br /> Mr. Sass went on, This (referencing a slide in the presentation) is an example of one (1) of the <br /> ones in the red category. These are planted every time, it seems, a dollar store is constructed. They <br /> make a decent street tree as they have nice form and flowers, but the weakness of these trees is a <br /> big deal. These are Asian trees from China and Vietnam. They are very weak and could break <br /> during any storm. So the nursery industry decided to create stronger varieties. The original one (1) <br /> was considered a sterile tree so it wasn't making fruit or spreading. But when they starting <br /> tinkering around with creating new varieties of these it started getting out of control. It is so bad <br /> that the DNR has asked for these trees to stop being planted. It is not illegal but they are pleading <br /> people to stop planting them. We took our concerns to Brent Thompson,the City Forester, and we <br /> had a very nice meeting. Brent identified the fact that he is not planting these trees but they are <br /> still being planted through Public Works and other independent contractors. He had mentioned he <br /> spoke with people from Public Works to stop planting but it still continued. He cited a couple <br /> different ordinances. Ordinance 1913 and 1914 which are the prohibited tree and shrub species <br /> list. He mentioned that and that is where it gets tricky from an EAC standpoint. <br /> Mr. Sass continued, EAC is an advisory council to the Park Board but this is larger than the Park <br /> Board. The Park Board apparently has authority to administer this ordinance but it is on the <br /> Council, of course, to write and update these ordinances. So we actually made a formal <br /> recommendation and it was sent to the Park Board.I think,also,the PARC Committee should have <br /> gotten this letter and formal recommendation. There were three (3) major things. One (1) was to <br /> update Ordinances 1913 and 1914 to represent more contemporary means. The Park Board <br /> exercises their authority to administer the ordinance so,according to City Code,all of the tree lawn <br /> plantings are under the jurisdiction of Park Board. The third (3rd) recommendation was to initiate <br /> a public education program to inform people why we shouldn't be planting these things. Even <br /> though you can buy them at Lowe's, it is not a good idea to plant these trees. <br /> Mr. Sass went on,Specifically we are looking at these two(2)ordinances. Section 19-13 references <br /> the Prohibited Species of Trees. Really, looking at the list,the list is there primarily to keep trees <br /> which drop things away from sidewalks and things like that. Maples were planted very frequently <br /> along streets and sidewalks and they don't make particularly good street trees.They were put there <br /> because people didn't like them. They didn't like having nuts or fruits all over the place. But they <br /> weren't really done from an ecological standpoint. Some of these are actually native trees such as <br /> the soft maple. These trees were also incredibly vague. Willow would pertain to thirty different <br /> species of things in Indiana now. I think this Ordinance only pertains to tree and lawn area or along <br /> any street. I would ask for clarification on what they mean by tree and lawn area. That would be <br /> another reason to look at rewriting this Ordinance. Then 1914 is the Prohibited Species of Shrubs <br /> and that is really interesting. The only shrub prohibiting is barberry and the reason for that goes <br /> back to before many of us could remember. Those plants were an alternate host to wheat rust and <br /> that was a really big deal seventy-five (75) years ago. So much so that they thought to put it into <br /> ordinance. Rust-resistant wheat plants have been available since the 1950s so that is no longer an <br /> issue. <br /> EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT <br /> 455 County-City Building 227 W.Jefferson Bvld!South Bend,Indiana 466011p574.235.9221If574.235.91731 574.235.5567Iwww.southbendin.gov <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.