Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Report 5/4/2018 <br /> compatible with an urban neighborhood. The proposed zoning is inconsistant and more <br /> intense than all of the neighboring properties. Development standards of the proposed <br /> zone, including sign regulations, could lead to disjointed development. Should the <br /> Commission or Council approve the rezoning and variances, DCI recommends the <br /> following to mitigate any negative impacts: 1) Offer a written commitment to limit the <br /> number of vehicles to 27 as shown on the site plan; 2) In lieu of providing foundation <br /> landscaping, add 1-2 replacement trees in the public tree lawn; 3) In lieu of providing full <br /> parking lot screening,provide landscaped areas with 3' hedges at the northeast corner of <br /> building and the northeast corner of the lot; 4) Install landscaped island to separate the <br /> restaurant spaces from the display spaces along the north property line; and 5)Bring the <br /> fence into compliance which is a maximum 4' in height and no barbed wire. <br /> Commitments: <br /> The petitioner is not proposing any written commitments. <br /> Criteria to be considered in reviewing rezoning requests, per IC 36-7-4-603: <br /> 1. Comprehensive Plan: <br /> Policy Plan: <br /> The proposed rezoning is inconsitent with City Plan, South Bend Comprehensive Plan <br /> (2006) Policy UD 4: Improve the character of the community's entryways and corridors <br /> and Policy LU 2.3: Ensure coordination of land uses among ajacent area-specific plans. <br /> Land Use Plan: <br /> The Future Land Use Plan identifies this area for mixed use development. <br /> Plan Implementation/Other Plans: <br /> The Southeast Neighborhood Master Plan (2015) calls for commercial uses to be located <br /> along major corridors. Strategy 1 states: Create pedestrian-friendly streetscapes along <br /> community corridors. <br /> 2. Current Conditions and Character: <br /> Michigan Street has been a major commercial corridor for the neighborhoods south of <br /> downtown, with a mix of commercial and residential uses. <br /> 3. Most Desirable Use: <br /> The most desirable use for this site would be low intensity commercial developments that <br /> serve the needs of the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> 4. Conservation of Property Values: <br /> The approval of this rezoning for a car dealership would not conserve the value of the <br /> surrounding properties. <br /> 5. Responsible Development And Growth: <br /> Is is not responsible development and growth to approve this rezoning. The proposed zone <br /> has development standards and uses that are out of character for this neighborhood. <br /> Combined Public Hearing <br /> This is a combined public hearing procedure,which includes a rezoning, a Special Exception <br /> Use, and 4 variances from the development standards. The Commission will forward the <br /> APC # 2865-18 Page 2 of 4 <br />