Laserfiche WebLink
Clinical Overview <br />Biphasic clefibrilllation comparison <br />These data represent the cumulative number of cardiac arrest patients in whom the VF termination efficacy (using the established definition of"re oval of VF for _> 5 <br />seconds") of specific biphasic waveforms and energy levels has been reported in published papers describing either randomized or consecutive case series of oHHCA or IIICA <br />patients. Included are papers that report a VF termination rate for at least one of 11 first shocks or Z) all shocks. Based on information available in the published literature as <br />of March 201.8. <br />**May deliver more energy than the E Series, M Series and ZOLL AEDs.zi,ee'rhis is less than the maximum energy delivered in LIFEPAK monitor/defibrillators and LIFE PAK AEDs. <br />Clinical strategies to improve conversion rates <br />The Critical Mass Theory is a meaningful conceptualization that can help clinicians improve conversion rates.' The goal is to <br />depolarize as much of the myocardial tissue as possible at once, placing it into a repolarized, refractory state unable to re -propagate <br />the electrical misfires that cause Vk/pVT. Two controllable factors can significantly impact this complex biological interaction. <br />1. optimize the size of the defibrillation field <br />Higher energy (J) can increase a shock's myocardial coverage <br />while less energy likely covers less. Data supports escalating to <br />3601 as a mechanism to maximize conversion rates.'.4,'a <br />Suboptimal <br />energy dose <br />Myocardium not <br />exposed to sufficient <br />electrical field <br />Closing point's <br />• Science recognizes that no individual characteristic of a well - <br />designed biphasic waveform determines conversion rate. The <br />combined total of a shock's electrical characteristics (energy <br />expressed in joules), determines conversion rate. <br />• The data shows that at the same low energy biphasic shocks, <br />the most widely used defibrillation waveforms (BTE and <br />RBW) have the same conversion rates from 50J to 240J. <br />2. Optimize the vector of the defibrillation field <br />Suboptimal pad placements can also lower conversion rates. <br />Escalating to 360J can compensate for these variations." <br />Suboptimal pad placement, <br />Myocardium not <br />exposed to sufficient <br />electrical field <br />i�—. I <br />Optimal lateral <br />Published clinical data demonstrate protocols with <br />escalating energy to 360J improves conversion rates for <br />difficult -to -defibrillate VF and AF patients, <br />No commercially available defibrillator on the market offers <br />equivalent strength to full energy biphasic (360J) offered <br />by Physio-Control LIFEPAX defibrillators for both AED and <br />manual defibrillation. <br />