My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/05/1913 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1913
>
09/05/1913 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2024 1:51:01 PM
Creation date
5/8/2018 9:52:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
9/5/1913
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
129 <br />Board met in regular session at 10:00 A.M. All members present. <br />Bond for One Thousand ($1,000.00)Dollars for construction work in City signed by Elias G. <br />Metz and. Fred W. Keller and L.C.Whi.tcomb was approved by the Board. <br />✓Bond and contract for grade, curb and walk on Gorby Street,Ukder Inp.rovement Resolution <br />No. 257. signed by Hugh Anderson and United States Fidelty & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore,Md., <br />was approved, by the Board., <br />Bond and contract for grade, curb and walk on Tenth Street, under improvement resolution. <br />No. 297. lied by Louis Zeiger and Frank J. Zeiger and Joseph Zeiger, was approved by the <br />Board. <br />Partial estimate allowed C. H. Defrees on Brick -pavement on Pine Street, to <br />theamount of....................................................................$2,696.83 <br />Partial estimate allowed C. H. Defrees, contractor for ._ Con.,navement improvement on <br />Prairie 'Avemues"for the4m6ullt Oft tstttttttstttttst:::ttss:ss::::sets::::::ttt:a 2�113.31 <br />Partial estimate on Grade, ^curb and walk on Prairie Avenue, allowed H. N. Barnes, <br />Contractor for the amount of****.-* ... .......... *a*..* .... # .... o.$12330*91 <br />,-,'Partial estimate for Trunk sewer on Bowman Creek allowed Stewart -Sheets & Co., for the <br />amount Of***** ........................................................ #09000*492634-95 <br />Partial estimate for.Dunham Street sewer system allowed L. H. _Webster for the amount <br />Of............................................................................ $3,221.36 <br />,-Indiana & Michigan Elec. Company granted permission to set poles as follows: - <br />One 35foot pole on the west side of the alley between Coquillard and Eddie St., about 60 <br />feet north of Sorin St... Same approved. <br />To set one 401 pole on the north-east corner of the alley between St. Louis Street and St. <br />Peters St., and the alley between Madison Street and LaSalle St. This to enable them to con- <br />nect the St. Louis Boulevard lighting to the overhead distributing system. Approved. <br />The following petition was filed with the. Board. <br />To the Honorable Board of Public Works: - <br />Your petitioners asking that the extension of Portage Ave. be 42 instead <br />of 50 feet wide, between the curbs, beg leave to present the following reasons for the <br />request: <br />First:- We believe that the avenue will be more beautiful, the abrupt widening <br />From 32 to 50 feet at the end of -the present car -line would give a far more awkward appearance . <br />than would the change to 4 2 feet. Then, with 50 feet between the curbs there is left only <br />20 feet for walks, borders and shade trees, and the park -way effect would be far less pleasing <br />than with 24 feet on each side. The boulevard effect can be made very fine with 24 feet; <br />while it cannot be produced with 4 feet less space. <br />a <br />Second: The matter of expense. It will cost between $12,000 and $15000 to pave <br />the 8 feet strip additional to the 42 feet. The cost of avenue improvements gill .be heavy <br />at best and any unnecessary expense will make more difficult, the receiving unaminous consent <br />of property holders for the paving of street. That 42 feet is ample with a single track, is <br />conceded by all, but it has been suggested that a double track maybe at some future time re- <br />quired. In answer to this suggestion we beg to state that if the population in that part <br />of the City incenses, a belt line returning along some street farther west, is more probable <br />as it would be more profitable than a double track on Portage; particularly as the present <br />paved portion is only 32 feet wide. But,if in the far future a double track is required, the <br />burb can be set back'the required"distance, at no exepnse, However, we point to Michigan <br />Ave. 17here a double track is operated without inconveience on a street not over 42 feet bet- <br />tween the curbs. <br />For these reason$: the beauty of the avenue, the added-exepnse , and the lack of nee- <br />essity we respectfully urge you to re -consider your former action and fix the width <br />of thw paved, street at 42 feet. <br />Approved with the understanding that the r6adwiy :sijalllbe:�•widened to 50 feet when the double <br />track is extended along Portage Avenue. <br />Otto C. Bastian Pres. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.