Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />JUNE 11, 2007 <br />this Section would bring the regulation for parking in the minimum front setback to the <br />same regulation that existed in the previous zoning ordinance. <br />Councilmember Puzzello, 1247 E. LaSalle Avenue, South Bend, Indiana, made the <br />presentation for this bill. <br />Councilmember Puzzello advised that this bill follows a bill that was passed previously <br />and it is probably very confusing to a lot of people. The issue of yard parking came up <br />because when the new zoning bill was passed the yard parking was mentioned but it was <br />confusing and when a property had been very negligent and had a lot of yard parking <br />went to court, the court's would not except it because they said it was not clear enough in <br />the zoning ordinance. It is necessary that the Council pass a bill that disallows parking in <br />yards. This is the second time that the Council has done something like this. The first <br />one addressed from a public safety point of view and it will allow police officers to tag <br />cars and fine people for parking in their yards. This bill does not include special <br />exceptions those will be addressed sometimes this summer, such as Parking on Notre <br />Dame Home Games or Special Family Events, Church Events, has not yet been <br />addressed by the Council and will not be a part of this bill. The bill that is before the <br />Council tonight is the same thing, but it addresses the problem of yard parking from a <br />zoning point of view and will allow Code Enforcement to tag cars that have been parked <br />in yards. The bill reads that the parking of any vehicles within the required minimum <br />front setback shall not be allow unless the parking is on a legal properly hard surfaced <br />driveway or parking space which has a durable and dust-free surface. The wording "hard <br />surface" has been discussed a lot both from both an environmental point of view and <br />from a hard ship case for some people and it is an issue that is still being discussed, and <br />talked about. Councilmember Puzzello reiterated that this bill would do the same as the <br />recently passed one, making it illegal for people to park in their front yard, unless it's on <br />a hard surface like a driveway. <br />This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents <br />and opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. <br />Ms. Catherine Toppel, Director, Code Enforcement, 13~` Floor County-City Building, <br />South Bend, Indiana, spoke in favor of this bill. <br />Ms. Toppel advised that she is in favor of this bill. This is a quality of life issue in the <br />neighborhoods. Unfortunately, due to the change in the ordinance in 2004, they have not <br />been able to enforce it. When a homeowner buys a home, they intend on relaxing in the <br />yard with the family and friends. Unfortunately when you have a neighbor that parks <br />their vehicle up in their yard next to you, you have to be very conscious of where you are <br />so you don't get hit. It is harder for the homeowner to enjoy their property and it does <br />become a quality of life, because of the ruts in the yard and children will have to be very <br />careful where they are playing in their own yards. <br />There being no one else presenting wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in <br />opposition to this bill, Councilmember Kuspa made a motion for favorable <br />recommendation to full Council concerning this bill as substituted. Councilmember <br />Dieter seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of six (6) ayes. <br />BILL NO. 21-07 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON <br />COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br />AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE SOUTH <br />BEND MUNICIPAL CODE: ARTICLE 2, <br />RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, TO ADD CORNER LOT <br />SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN THE SF 1 DISTRICT; <br />TO CLARIFY THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES <br />PERMITTED IN A GARAGE; TO PROHIBIT <br />SECURITY-STYLE FENCING WITH CERTAIN <br />EXCEPTIONS; ARTICLE 3 COMMERCIAL/MIXED <br />USE DISTRICTS, TO REMOVE REFERENCES TO <br />11 <br />