Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 13, 2010 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis stated that he would still like to have a resolution or <br />something in writing. He thanked Mayor Luecke for the offer but would like to have the <br />Council needs to take care of that business rather than administration or outside forces. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis stated that he would follow up with Councilmember White <br />request and Councilmember Varner’s suggestion to write a letter to the Redevelopment <br />Commission asking for the Council to have an appointment to the Architectural Review <br />Board, per Mayor Luecke’s commitment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis stated that it was not Councilmember Oliver Davis’ place, <br />that it was the Chairperson of the Zoning and Annexation Committee. <br /> <br />Councilmember Al “Buddy” Kirsits, Chairperson, Zoning and Annexation Committee <br />stated that he understands Councilmember Henry Davis’ concern and asked Chief Deputy <br />City Attorney Aladean DeRose could they make an amendment to the PUD on page 21 <br />regarding the Architectural Review Board. <br /> <br />Ms. DeRose advised that they could amend the PUD to include on page 21 (c) to include: <br />An Architectural Review Board (“ARB”) shall be established for Ignition Park to include <br />an appointment from the South Bend Common Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis, Jr. insisted that a resolution or an attachment be drawn up <br />requesting that the Council has an appointment to the Architectural Review Board. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis, Jr. stated that he would make a motion requesting that the <br />Council has an appointment to the Architectural Review Board at the end of the <br />presentation. <br /> <br />Mr. Valenzano continued his presentation stating that what they tried to do with the PUD <br />is to establish rezoning for the 84 acres or main portion called Ignition Park. 1. The <br />other areas 2, 3, and 4 combined with that could lead up to a combined park area up to <br />140 acres. The uses that they have identified for area 1 which is the main part are <br />basically three groupings: 1. Educational uses being colleges, universities or commercial <br />trade schools. 2. Industrial uses primarily featuring engineering or research lab proto- <br />type facilities and testing facilities; 3. Corporate offices and other professional type <br />offices. Those are three main ideas that are proposed here. There are some support uses <br />or accessory uses such as a conference center and some retail uses. Within the PUD they <br />have established some development standards that have an urban feel to them. The <br />provide protection to the park itself and the surrounding developments such as set backs <br />that will be provided and landscaping. They also provide protection from the <br />surrounding areas within the park. They have standards set up that deal with the building <br />set backs, site landscaping, deal with access to the overall park, parking, loading, <br />lighting, and size. The idea is to set up regulations that are stringent around the perimeter <br />so that just like any zoning ordinance you are protecting yourself from the outside and the <br />outside from the inside, but also be flexible enough on the interior of the site so that you <br />get a true campus feel as this project grows over time and have all those areas properly <br />protected. He reiterated that Areas 2, 3, and 4 are not included in this rezoning at the <br />present time, but they have tried to do is plan ahead as the Redevelopment Commission <br />buys property in areas 2, 3, and 4 and reach that critical mass for redevelopment they can <br />be brought in and attached to the same document with a new legal description and <br />everything can fit together like hand and glove and that is the whole idea of what they are <br />trying to do for the entire 140 acres and give specific zoning on the 84 acres at this point <br />in time. He stated that the whole reason for doing this is to establish a high tech research <br />park feel for Ignition Park. With all the amenities that are needed to be in place to create <br />what everyone says is so desirable as the live, work, play environment, they feel that this <br />is necessary to attract new businesses, new jobs to the City of South Bend within this <br />park. He stated that they chose a PUD to do this because to be very honest, the uses that <br />they are talking about going into Ignition Park, could go into the Park under General <br />Industrial classification, but there are a ton of other uses that could come into the park <br />under General Industrial classification. He reiterated that they have limited uses that <br /> 5 <br /> <br />