Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />it had not been brought to the attention of <br />However, he stated that the Board operated i <br />tions which allowed flexibility at its meet: <br />fact welcomed the input from any citizen or <br />concerning any matter. He stated that he r( <br />Mr. Bancroft was placed in with the recent ( <br />He stated that, when the ordinance was pass( <br />public hearing by the Common Council after <br />He stated that the Board was required to lo( <br />aspects of the case and all of this informal <br />to the Council for its consideration when ii <br />when there would be ample time to voice obj( <br />by the residents. He pointed out that the ( <br />the required report from a city office at tl <br />not result in a delay in the hearing before <br />Bancroft stated that he would go through hi: <br />for the benefit of the objecting residents < <br />the previous public hearing. He stated that <br />Manager of the facility, was also present a� <br />questions concerning the operation. Mr. Hi: <br />that he did not feel another presentation wz <br />that the Bremen petition was the first petit <br />ing under the new ordinance and it was hope( <br />would be established as a result of this pei <br />Mr. McMahon in that the Board was designate( <br />concentrate on the technical requriements o.- <br />such matters as traffic and noise, which wee <br />items that the Council _would need to address <br />He stated that he was ,concerne,d,about °Mr. Ki <br />the 1,000 foot distance requirement. Mr. B, <br />ordinance provides that, after the effectiv( <br />no licenses shall be issued to a scrap deal( <br />certain zoning use districts; and the same ( <br />that the above requirement shall not apply <br />yard previously licensed and in continuous ( <br />passage of the ordinance. Mr. Bancroft inf( <br />the site has previously been used as a junk <br />and still in operation as such. He stated i <br />Metal would not be operating a junk yard at <br />Hill agreed with Mr. Bancroft that, where tl <br />tions, those areas were exempted from the of <br />agreed; however, he questioned whether or n( <br />expanded which was what Bremen was proposin, <br />stated that the intent of the ordinance was <br />ing areas, and he submitted a use plan whic] <br />site. He pointed out that certain areas woe <br />space and parking, and he stated that he wa: <br />not in the "E" heavy industrial zoning. He <br />areas could be deleted from the petition. Z <br />Board would only issue the license for tha- <br />and Mr. Bancroft stated that there was no n( <br />and parking to fall within the heavy indust: <br />Mrs. Zemlyak interrupted stating that Mr. & <br />was not going to operate a junk yard, and sl <br />then requesting a license to operate one. l <br />Board was faced with a determination on the <br />clear, technical compliance with the ordinal <br />at this point was whether or not there cowl( <br />existing operation which would not comply w: <br />requirement. He felt it was clear that the <br />within the existing use, and he cautioned tl <br />to be consistent on this decision and futur( <br />agreed and felt that many of the issues rai; <br />important, but would be more appropriate if <br />Council at its public hearing. He suggestei <br />be allowed to further pursue the controlled <br />SEPTEMBER 8, 1980 . <br />the Board previously. <br />ender rules and regula- <br />.ngs, and the Board in <br />resident at any time <br />:cognized the disadvantage <br />)bjections being voiced. <br />:d, it provided for a <br />Lction by the Board. <br />)k at the technical <br />:ion would be forwarded <br />: held its public hearing <br />action to the petition <br />lelay in not getting <br />ie public hearing would <br />the Council. Mr. <br />o entire presentation <br />igain as he had at <br />Mr. Daniel Rifkin, <br />;ain to answer any <br />_1 advised Mr. Bancroft <br />is necessary. He stated <br />:ion the Board was consider- <br />: that certain guidelines <br />Ation. He agreed with <br />I the public body to <br />the ordinance, -and <br />-e very important, were <br />at its public hearing. <br />iepp's comments regarding <br />incroft stated that the <br />date of the ordinance, <br />�r within 1,000 feet of <br />) rdinance also provided <br />:o any scrap or junk <br />> peration prior to <br />>rmed the Board that <br />yard and was licensed <br />:hat Bremen Iron and <br />that location. Mr. <br />Lere were existing opera - <br />.dinance. Mr. Knepp <br />)t the use could be <br />r to do. Mr. Bancroft <br />to "grandfather" exist - <br />i designated.the proposed <br />ild be used for office <br />aware those areas were <br />stated that those specific <br />fr. Hill stated that the <br />: which was zoned properly, <br />:ed for the office building <br />-ial zoning classification. <br />incroft had stated Bremen <br />Le wondered why they were <br />fr. Hill stated that the <br />petition which must show <br />ice. He felt the issue <br />I be an expansion of the <br />:th the 1,000 foot <br />junkyard would fall <br />iat the Board would need <br />decisions. Mr. McMahon <br />,ed by the residents were <br />addressed to the Common <br />I that the Legal Department <br />use requirements and, if <br />r <br />I i� <br />L _I <br />it <br />1 <br />