My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/08/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
09/08/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2011 4:19:06 PM
Creation date
1/21/2011 4:30:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
9/8/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />construction. He also stated that there has <br />the owner in getting to this point, but he f <br />were needed as he had outlined. Mr. Carl Le: <br />representing Mr. Mickelson, submitted photo& <br />which had been taken on September 6, 1980. <br />examination of the fence shows that the fend <br />and material. He stated that, along the rai <br />was no requriement for a fence. Mr. Hill st; <br />about the height and distance from the corner <br />along the side. He stated that the Board de; <br />visability of the yard from the streets. Mr <br />that the fence height itself was in conjunct: <br />had ordered some time ago. He stated that, : <br />required along the side of the property as m� <br />would see that Mr. Mickelson complied. Mr. ] <br />was concerned with the uniformity of the gate <br />He stated that this was one of the complaint; <br />Mr. Leibowitz stated that his client was try: <br />He asked what the requirement was for the fei <br />that it was supposed to be a 6 -foot high fens <br />Leibowitz that the problem with the gate is <br />attached to the existing chain -link fence. I <br />that that was what the Board approved at the <br />Albert Mickelson informed the Board that he l <br />hinges for the gate and certain areas of the <br />He stated that the fence was 12 -foot high, ai <br />the height of the entire fence to 6 feet whit <br />In this way, he could eliminate the problem i <br />Hill stated that the Board would like to see <br />at 12 feet because the shielding is better tI <br />that the gate be modified to be uniform with <br />He stated that he would prefer not to see the <br />asked that the side area be fenced and the g, <br />with the rest of the fence. Mr. Leibowitz si <br />would try to work out a solution to the pres4 <br />to come up with some alternatives and suggest <br />Board's request. He asked that a 30 -day per: <br />purpose. Mr. Hill advised Mr. Leibowitz that <br />be granted, during which time, plans should I <br />Board concerning the improvements to be made <br />SEPTEMBER 8, 1980 <br />been cooperation from <br />alt further improvements <br />_bowitz, the attorney <br />-aphs to the Board <br />[e stated that an <br />was of uniform color <br />_road property, there <br />Lted that he was talking <br />- of the property and <br />aired to limit total <br />Leibowitz stated <br />_on with what the Board <br />_f a 12 -foot height was <br />Lndated by ordinance, he <br />[ill stated that the Board <br />area and its appearance. <br />registered with the Board. <br />_ng to act in good faith. <br />ice, and Mr. Hill stated <br />:e. He advised Mr. <br />:hat the material is <br />[r. Leibowitz stated <br />time of the hearing. Mr. <br />Lad purchased all new <br />fence had been re- done. <br />Ld perhaps he should lower <br />.h was required by ordinance. <br />iith the gate area. Mr. <br />the entire fence remain <br />Lan required. He asked <br />the rest of the fence. <br />fence lowered. He <br />Lte area be in conformity <br />:ated that he and his cleint <br />:nt problems in an effort <br />:ions regarding the <br />.od be allowed for this <br />: a 30 -day period would <br />,e submitted to the <br />ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 18, 1980 - SCRAP DEALER'S <br />LICENSE FOR BREMEN IRON AND METAL) <br />RESOLUTION NO. 18,'11980 <br />WHEREAS, a petition by Bremen Iron and Metal Company, Inc., was <br />submitted to the Board of Public Works on August 18, 1980, for <br />the operation of a waste metal scrap operation on property <br />located off of Sample Street immediately east of Webster Street <br />and extending along and to the rear of thelPenn Central Railroad <br />tracks (more particularly described in a map attached to said <br />petition); and <br />WHEREAS, inspections of the property have been completed by the <br />Environmental Protection Office and the Fire Prevention Bureau <br />as required by Ordinance No. 6621 -79; and <br />WHEREAS, petitioner has agreed to conform with all of the rules . <br />and regulations as contained in said ordinance regarding minimum <br />lot area, fencing, buffer strip, no storage outside fenced area <br />and other regulations dealing with removal'iand storage of <br />materials, fire protection and health and safety standards; and <br />WHEREAS, in accordance with Ordinance No. 6621 -79, approval for <br />a scrap dealer's license shall be approvedlby the Board of Public <br />Works and the Common Council prior to the issuance of said license <br />by the City Controller. <br />�I <br />u <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.