My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/11/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
08/11/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2011 4:18:31 PM
Creation date
1/21/2011 4:27:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
8/11/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />hoped all the scrap dealers would have inst� <br />to the July lst deadline since a year had b( <br />ance, but he stated that the Board was plea: <br />being done. Mr. Masters again stated that <br />to all scrap dealers, on June 12, 1980, adv: <br />lst deadline. In addition, the scrap dealer <br />in the public hearing when the Council pass( <br />were aware of the deadline in July, 1980. 1 <br />number of businesses have complied and he f( <br />excuse for non - compliance in view of the tii <br />stated that a two -week notice had been mail( <br />compliance by the Clerk of the Board advisii <br />public hearing and informing them that thei7 <br />suspended for failure to comply by July lst <br />stated that his client had been in the proce: <br />fence which had always surrounded the propel <br />felt was adequate but was not allowed under <br />not feel his client had violated any ordinal <br />always enclosed the property. Mr. Hill star <br />required an opaque or solid fencing and the <br />consist of that type of material. Mr. Schu: <br />four scrap yards located within the immediai <br />that there was not a dwelling or building w= <br />of the yards, and he did not feel the yards <br />the neighbors in the area. Mr. Masters aga: <br />ordinance requiring the opaque fencing had � <br />ago, and all the dealers had been given amp: <br />felt it was not fair to those dealers who h, <br />ordinance to see that some dealers had not ( <br />the Board either suspend the licenses of the <br />complied effective next Monday, August 18, : <br />not completed at that time; or continue the <br />time. Upon a motion made by Mr. Hill, secoi <br />carried, the hearing on Western Avenue Iron <br />continued to August 18, 1980, to allow for <br />installation and supplemental information fi <br />Mr. Jack-C. Dunfee, Jr., Attorney at Law, pi <br />Floor of the First Bank Building, stated thz <br />Bremen Iron and Metal Company, 3113 South G( <br />explained that his client had had a fence <br />for many years, and a contract to install n( <br />awarded on June 26, 1980. Because of a delz <br />construction had been delayed somewhat, but <br />the fencing would be completed by the end of <br />that, in his professional opinion, he did n( <br />applied to his client; however, Bremen Iron <br />challenging the ordinance and was willing t( <br />required fencing. He felt the ordinance di( <br />it applied, and he stated that it did not al <br />yards. Regarding the Leonard Bush location; <br />Board had been informed there would be somel <br />of the Board's next meetings. Regarding th( <br />he felt they had not expended much effort of <br />fencing erected. He concluded that he felt <br />be solved by requiring fencing around the y� <br />stated that the ordinance had gone into eff( <br />informed Mr. Dunfee that it applied to all <br />Inspector advised the Board that Bremen Iron <br />process of installing the fence, and he subs <br />firming this. Upon a motion made by Mr. Hill <br />McMahon and carried, the hearing on Bremen <br />was continued to August 18, 1980, to allow J <br />fence installation and supplemental informal <br />Inspector. <br />AUGUST 11, 1980 <br />fled the fencing prior <br />en allowed for compli- <br />ed that the work was <br />letter had gone out <br />sing them of the July <br />s had been involved <br />d the ordinance and <br />.e stated that a <br />It there was no <br />ie allowed. He also <br />d to those not in <br />,g them of this <br />licenses may be <br />Mr. Schulman <br />s of replacing the <br />ty, which fence he <br />the ordinance. He did <br />.ce since fencing had <br />ed that the ordinance <br />existing fence did not <br />man stated that there were <br />e vicinity. He stressed <br />thin 1,000 feet of any <br />were a nuisance to <br />n stated that the <br />one into effect a year <br />e time to comply. He <br />d complied with the <br />omplied. He asked that <br />se dealers who had not <br />980, if the work was <br />hearing until that <br />.ded by Mr. McMahon and <br />and Metal Company was <br />ompletion of the fence <br />om the Fire Inspector. <br />acticing on the Sixth <br />t he was representing <br />rtrude Street. He <br />round the property <br />w fencing had been <br />y in material shipments, <br />it was expected the <br />this week. He stated <br />t feel the ordinance <br />and Metal was not <br />go ahead with the <br />not specify to whom <br />ply to existing scrap <br />he explained that the <br />hing forthcoming at one <br />se people who have complied, <br />money to have the <br />the problems would not <br />rds. Mr. Masters again <br />ct a year ago, and he <br />xisting yards. The Fire <br />and Metal was in the <br />.itted a photograph con - <br />1, seconded by Mr. <br />ron and Metal Company <br />or completion of the <br />ion from the Fire <br />1 <br />11 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.