My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/04/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
08/04/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2011 4:18:20 PM
Creation date
1/21/2011 4:24:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
8/4/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />AUGUST 4, 1980 <br />and Mr. Howell again stated that it had been. He explained that <br />he took the test for a chauffeur's license and was unaware his <br />operator's license had been suspended. Mr. Crone asked if Mr. <br />Howell had been found guilty of any other traffic laws or speeding <br />laws, and Mr. Howell indicated that, in addition to the speeding <br />in September of 1979, he had been guilty of improper passing in <br />1978. Mr. Crone stated that Mr. Howell had been charged with <br />six moving violations and had been found guilty on two of them, <br />and Mr. Howell stated that Mr. Crone was correct. Mr.. Crone <br />asked if there were currently any other charges pending against <br />Mr. Howell, to which Mr. Howell stated there were not. Mr. Crone <br />asked if Mr. Howell had served time on the felony, and Mr. Howell <br />stated that he had served four years and two months and that the <br />felony had been his first offense. He stated that he had been <br />out of prison since 1978. Mr. Crone stated that Mr. Howell <br />would now have an opportunity to make a statement to the Board <br />and answer any of the Board's questions. Mr. Howell simply stated <br />that he desired to have a taxi cab license. Mr. Hill stated that, <br />from 1978 to the present, Mr. Howell had been involved in two <br />traffic convictions. He asked if there were any other arrests <br />or convictions, to which Mr. Howell stated there were not. Mr. <br />Hill asked if there was anything other than traffic violations . <br />or any other pending charges, and Mr. Howell stated there were <br />not. Mr. Crone asked if Mr. Howell had contacted any local cab <br />companies, and Mr. Howell stated that he had contacted Yellow <br />Cab for employment and had been told he must have a chauffeur's <br />license. Mr. Hill explained to Mr. Howell that, in the past, <br />the Board has handled similar denials for taxi cab licenses by <br />looking at past police records and trying to be reasonable when <br />there are no serious felony convictions. He stated that one of <br />the items that typically come before the Board for examination <br />was a police printout, and he stated that that information was <br />not available to the Board at this time. He stated that he was <br />not prepared to deny the license but he felt he wanted additional <br />time to obtain the printout from the Police Department before <br />making a decision. Mr. Howell informed the Board that the printout <br />would not show any additional information from what he had just <br />furnished the Board in questioning. <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Mr.. McMahon and <br />carried, the hearing of Mr. Howell was continued to the August <br />11, 1980, meeting of the Board, and the Clerk was instructed to <br />request the criminal record printout and an update of Mr. Howell's <br />license check from the Police Department. <br />REPORT ON PINHOOK PARK SITUATION <br />Mr. Hill stated that, in response to the complaints brought to the <br />attention of the Board at its meeting on July 21, 1980, concerning <br />the use of Pinhook Park and the problems being caused to the <br />residents in the area, he had met with police and park officials <br />and it had been determined that the Park Board would consider, at <br />its next meeting, suspending the parking fee for the parking lot. <br />The residents had felt that, since there was a fee being charged <br />for parking in the lot, the users of the park were parking on <br />the residential streets where, in the past before the fee was <br />instituted, they had been parking in the lot. Mr. Hill hoped <br />that, with the suspension of the parking fee, the residents would <br />not be plagued with park users parking in front of their homes, on <br />their lawns and blocking their driveways. Additionally, the <br />problems that have been experienced during the night have subsided, <br />according to Mr. Hill, and he stated that the police and the admin- <br />istration will continue to monitor the situation. Upon a motion <br />made by Mr. McMahon, seconded by Mr. Kernan and carried, the <br />report was accepted. <br />D <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.