Laserfiche WebLink
EMERGENCY MEETING <br />JULY 16 -. 1980 <br />An emergency meeting of the Board of Public Works was convened at <br />9:30 a.m., on Wednesday, July 16, 1980, by President Patrick M. <br />McMahon, with Mr. McMahon, Mr. Richard L. Hill and Mr. Joseph E. <br />Kernan present. Mr. McMahon explained that the meeting had been <br />called at the request of Mr. John Leszczynski, Director of <br />Utilities, concerning the heavy water usage by residents and <br />the problem of contaminants which had been previously detected <br />at the Olive Street Pumping Station and which had necessitated <br />the closing of Well No. 4. <br />Mr. Leszczynski explained that the city has experienced excessive <br />water usage during the last several weeks because of the hot and <br />dry weather and, on July 15, 1980, the highest usage was.recorded <br />at 43 million gallons. He requested that the Board put into effect <br />mandatory sprinkling restrictions such as an "odd- even" sprinkling <br />procedure, which would provide sufficient water in the case of a <br />potential fire or other public safety hazard. Mayor Roger 0. Parent <br />stated that by using his emergency powers, he was recommending that <br />the Board adopt a resolution restricting the use of water throughout <br />the city. Mr. McMahon stated that he concurred with Mr. Leszczynski's <br />recommendation concerning the "odd- even" sprinkling method which <br />would provide that, on even- numbered days, the house numbers ending <br />in an even number would sprinkle and so forth. Mr. McMahon explained <br />that the city did not have I a supply problem at present, but there <br />could be a potential problem if a major fire occurred. Mr..Hill <br />explained that the Board of Public Works has enforcement powers <br />and any action taken by the Board would be provided to the violators. <br />If there was a continued violation, the Legal Department would take <br />action and the Municipal Code provided a fine for violations. Mr. <br />Hill stated that he hoped this would not happen; however, he <br />stressed that there certainly would be mandatory enforcement. <br />He suggested that there may be a possibility to attach a special <br />assessment to the water bills as an alternative; however, he felt <br />the method of assessing fines to the violators would be followed. <br />Mr. McMahon explained that, in the case of automatic sprinkler <br />systems, a separate meter was utilized and could be shut off to <br />prevent sprinkling. He further stated that, when the weather <br />conditions improved, the limits would be lifted. <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. McMahon, seconded by Mr. Kernan and <br />carried, the Board adopted the following resolution: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 12, 1980 <br />WHEREAS, because of the excessive usage of water in the last <br />few weeks, the Board of Public Works has determined that, <br />for the best interests of the citizens of the City of <br />South Bend, a system of mandatory sprinkling be established <br />in order to provide sufficient water in the event of a fire <br />or any other health and safety related matter. <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Public Works of the City of <br />South Bend, Indiana, that the following mandatory sprink- <br />ling restrictions be placed in effect until such time as <br />the Board determines the need no longer exists: <br />On even numbered days, the house numbers <br />ending in an even number be allowed to <br />sprinkle. <br />On odd numbered days, the house numbers <br />ending in an odd number be allowed to <br />sprinkle. <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any violation of the above mandatory <br />sprinkling method will result in a' penalty consistent with <br />those penalties currently existing in the Municipal Code <br />relating to emergency powers of the Mayor and the Board of <br />Public Works. <br />NOTE: MANDATORY SPRINKLING RESTRICTIONS WERE LIFTED BY THE <br />BOARD OF WATER WORKS COMMISSIONERS ON AUGUST 4, 1980. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />