My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-2008 Newsletter
sbend
>
Public
>
Newsletters
>
2008
>
02-2008 Newsletter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2011 3:42:33 PM
Creation date
1/19/2011 1:45:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 TH <br />U �b:li � ���T e� �Y��p EN D <br />i <br />FEBRUARY 2008 13t,"14", , 1 <br />Mayor? STFphry J. LcFckf <br />Letter from the Mayor <br />Dear Friends and Neighbors, <br />There has been much discussion recently about prop- <br />erty taxes. These funds pay for important services: police and <br />fire protection, parks, libraries and schools. Economic develop- <br />ment and street repairs are also supported by property taxes, but <br />we have become too reliant on them. We need a broader, flexi- <br />ble funding stream for local government which is stable, ac- <br />countable and equitable. It must ensure an adequate source of <br />revenue to support key services — and any change to the current <br />system should be revenue neutral so there is no windfall gain, <br />nor catastrophic loss of revenue. <br />For three years I have been an advocate for Hometown <br />Matters, a proposal that would allow cities and towns to create a <br />mix of local taxes, including sales and income, reducing reliance <br />on property taxes yet still meeting communities' needs. I believe <br />that it is still the best option to fix our property tax mess. How- <br />ever, as I write this letter primary attention is focused on <br />HB1001, the Governor's plan for tax caps. This plan is really a <br />tax shift, not a tax cut. It imposes an additional 1% sales cap <br />statewide and will force local governments to impose an income <br />tax to replace lost revenue. <br />The tax caps of 1% for homeowners, 2% for other resi- <br />dential property and 3% for business property would cause the <br />taxing units in St. Joseph County to lose $64.5 million per year. <br />County government would lose $9.5M, Mishawaka would lose <br />almost $7M, PHM Schools - $2.5M, South Bend Schools - <br />$9.4M, Transpo - $1.5M, St. Joseph County Library - $2.6M. <br />Revenue for the City of South Bend would shrink by $26.8M! <br />That is over 1/3 of our property tax revenue! These dollars sup- <br />port critical services in our city. The chart on this page shows <br />Expenditures Funded By Property Taxes <br />2008 Budget <br />Other General Gov't Serv. <br />Code (Animal Control <br />4 %� 2 /o _2% <br />Engr I Traf. & Lighting <br />7% <br />Parks & Reco <br />SI LISTED NO ENTIENDE INGLES Y NECESITA AYUOA PARA TRADUCIR :ESTE DOCLI MENTO, O Sl TIENE ALGUNA PREGLINTA, POR FAVOR LLAME AL TED <br />(574) 235 -5858 X IOOO. <br />how property taxes are used in South Bend. If these lost revenues <br />are not replaced, we face dire consequences. We would lose al- <br />most 50% of the funds we use for economic development, funds <br />that have helped to bring over $1/2 billion of private investment <br />and thousands of new jobs to South Bend. We would be in default <br />on three bonds. Other property tax funds would be cut by over <br />25 %. That would result in: <br />• 17 fewer employees in general government <br />• 65 fewer police officers, and 15 fewer civilians in <br />PD <br />• 7 fewer personnel in our 911 communications cen <br />ter <br />• 62 fewer Firefighters, and 2 fewer office support <br />personnel <br />• That's a total loss of 152 total public safety per - <br />sonel would mean closing our zoo and greenhouse <br />• 7 fewer staff for Code Enforcement and Animal <br />Control <br />• 16 fewer personnel for the Street Department/ <br />Traffic & Lighting <br />• 4 fewer engineers and support staff, losing the cost <br />savings of doing work in -house <br />• 30 fewer Parks and Recreation employees - most <br />likely this would mean closing our zoo and green <br />house <br />(cont'd on next page) <br />S'sAkcadylPlawl_� <br />g <br />South Bend is committed to reducing costs while providing the <br />services that residents and businesses require in a cost - <br />effective and efficient manner. <br />> Reduced city workforce by 95 positions since 2000. <br />> Last year, many city employees received no raise. <br />> Using technology to reduce costs and be more effective: <br />• Replacing incandescent bulbs in our traffic signals <br />with LED lights saving $2.5 million over 10 years. <br />• New street sweepers and pothole patchers allow <br />fewer staff to perform the same or more work. <br />• Use of methane generated at the Wastewater Treat- <br />ment Plant saves $250,000/yr in energy costs. <br />• Consolidation of mowing operations in the City. <br />• Sharing several governmental functions with the <br />County. <br />Police <br />11 /o <br />Public Safety <br />-.,—Total <br />53% <br />Com m. & <br />Econ Develop. <br />21% <br />SI LISTED NO ENTIENDE INGLES Y NECESITA AYUOA PARA TRADUCIR :ESTE DOCLI MENTO, O Sl TIENE ALGUNA PREGLINTA, POR FAVOR LLAME AL TED <br />(574) 235 -5858 X IOOO. <br />how property taxes are used in South Bend. If these lost revenues <br />are not replaced, we face dire consequences. We would lose al- <br />most 50% of the funds we use for economic development, funds <br />that have helped to bring over $1/2 billion of private investment <br />and thousands of new jobs to South Bend. We would be in default <br />on three bonds. Other property tax funds would be cut by over <br />25 %. That would result in: <br />• 17 fewer employees in general government <br />• 65 fewer police officers, and 15 fewer civilians in <br />PD <br />• 7 fewer personnel in our 911 communications cen <br />ter <br />• 62 fewer Firefighters, and 2 fewer office support <br />personnel <br />• That's a total loss of 152 total public safety per - <br />sonel would mean closing our zoo and greenhouse <br />• 7 fewer staff for Code Enforcement and Animal <br />Control <br />• 16 fewer personnel for the Street Department/ <br />Traffic & Lighting <br />• 4 fewer engineers and support staff, losing the cost <br />savings of doing work in -house <br />• 30 fewer Parks and Recreation employees - most <br />likely this would mean closing our zoo and green <br />house <br />(cont'd on next page) <br />S'sAkcadylPlawl_� <br />g <br />South Bend is committed to reducing costs while providing the <br />services that residents and businesses require in a cost - <br />effective and efficient manner. <br />> Reduced city workforce by 95 positions since 2000. <br />> Last year, many city employees received no raise. <br />> Using technology to reduce costs and be more effective: <br />• Replacing incandescent bulbs in our traffic signals <br />with LED lights saving $2.5 million over 10 years. <br />• New street sweepers and pothole patchers allow <br />fewer staff to perform the same or more work. <br />• Use of methane generated at the Wastewater Treat- <br />ment Plant saves $250,000/yr in energy costs. <br />• Consolidation of mowing operations in the City. <br />• Sharing several governmental functions with the <br />County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.