My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-30-10 Common Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010
>
11-30-10 Common Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2011 12:33:11 PM
Creation date
1/12/2011 4:46:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPECIAL MEETING NOVEMBER 30, 2010 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke advised that he did not believe that there was a deficiency per Major <br />League/Minor League Baseball standards related to the scoreboard. And, certainly not in <br />relation to the other enhancements that they are proposing as well and that their <br />presentation never indicated that those were deficiencies, but felt that it was an <br />opportunity to spruce up a twenty-five (25) year old stadium and to bring it up to current <br />public standards as well as minor league baseball standards so that it continues to be a <br />place for families to enjoy themselves. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner stated that they can bring it up to standards without some of the <br />other things. He stated that he believes that they have collectively made the effort to <br />select the specifics and the necessities and then it would be good to go forward with that <br />Councilmember Varner stated that it was referenced to the Ft. Wayne stadium project. <br />He noted that project had a major hotel chain involved as well as private dollars and <br />dollars invested by the team along with a bond issue, he didn’t know how much money <br />was involved with that, but there were some guaranteed revenues. He stated that some of <br />the citizens in South Bend would call some of the proposed enhancements extravagant <br />during these economic times. He stated that if everyone expects grand things to happen, <br />there needs to be some willingness to more dollars collectively rather than just the city <br />but he wanted to make clear some things are necessary and what most people would <br />agree to and probably consider. <br /> <br />Councilmember White asked that the project that is before the Council tonight what was <br />the process that went through in identifying that these would be used for this project. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that as they looked at the proposals that they wanted to bring before <br />the Council for funding they had looked at a variety of funding sources. First, the use of <br />the Recovery Zone Bonds that will be paid back by the Professional Sports Development <br />dollars and that is in the bill that will be considered next by the Council. Then there were <br />some available downtown TIF dollars that they could commit to the project. And as they <br />looked at the remaining amount of approximately 3 million dollars, he felt it appropriate <br />to use some of those dollars that they had been reserving over the past several years for <br />capital expenditures in the COIT and EDIT funds. He stated that these are dollars that <br />they have been collecting and receiving. He stated that if the Council will recall there <br />had been some smaller capital budgets than they had historically had because they were <br />reserving those dollars in the event that they would need them for operating expenditures <br />for the City of South Bend. Mayor Luecke stated that it has been this administration that <br />those dollars should generally not be used for operating but for capital investment in <br />infrastructure and facilities that they own and economic development initiatives because <br />those are critical dollars to have to keep our facilities up to snuff and to be able to spur <br />additional private investment in the community. So he felt that the 30% of the funding <br />for this project coming from COIT and EDIT dollars was a reasonable distribution of <br />resources as they brought this forward. Again, they felt that the full package was worth <br />funding by the City as they move forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis asked the Mayor to elaborate on the issue of using local <br />labor and workers for the project. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that one of the considerations would be to do a project labor <br />agreement on construction work at the Cove in particular because of the very tight time <br />frame to accomplish the work within that time frame. That would also add for goals to <br />use local labor and local purchasing as they do that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rouse stated that he supports the project except for the use of COIT and <br />EDIT. He stated that he likes the idea of sustaining the Cove. But the Professional Sport <br />Development Fund expires in 2027 and the money that they would be using here to <br />support the bonds, hopefully the bonds would be paid off by the expiration, but what is <br />the City going to do going forward to sustain Coveleski? Councilmember Rouse noted <br />that question is resonating throughout the Council of putting that debt on future <br />generations and how they are going to pay for it. He stated that the 17 years will be here <br />before we know it, and is suggesting that they need that on the radar screen. How is the <br />City going to pay for the Cove going forward and maintain it, because he feels that there <br /> 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.