Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 2010 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />th <br />employment since 1956. He stated that on June 16 2010, the Human Rights <br />Commission passed a resolution requesting that the Common Council pass Bill 30-10, <br />which would amend the Human Rights Ordinance to include prohibitions against <br />employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The <br />vote was all in favor with one member of the Commission absent. He stated that he <br />wanted to be clear that, in this resolution, the Commission has his full support for several <br />reasons. First, as the resolution noted, the Commission receives complaints alleging <br />employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, but is not <br />empowered to investigate these complaints. The Commission can assist GLBT citizens <br />who face discrimination on the basis of their sex, their religion, their race, or their color, <br />but if discrimination is focused on sexual orientation or gender identity, the Commission <br />cannot investigate on behalf of any citizen, gay or straight. Bill No. 30-10 would allow <br />the Commission to treat GLBT persons the same as any other citizen of our City. Right <br />now they are not receiving equal and just treatment. Second, because the mission of the <br />Commission is to initiate investigations into discriminatory practices, the proposed <br />amendment is necessary for the Commission to carry out its mission. In addition to <br />receiving reports and carrying out investigations, the Commission acts as conciliator <br />between employer and employee. The Commission is not able to serve these functions <br />with regards to sexual orientation or gender identity discrimination without enabling <br />legislation. Discrimination is discrimination, and is of great concern to the Commission. <br />Third, one of the duties of the Commission is to recommend to the Mayor and the <br />Common Council legislation that can further the purposes of the Human Rights <br />Ordinance. Because the Human Rights Ordinance is intended to promote equal <br />opportunity in employment for all of South Bend’s citizens, the Commission is <br />compelled to act when a specific type of discrimination is repeatedly reported. He stated <br />that for these reasons, he supports the Human Rights Commission’s resolution, and <br />encourages the Common Council to pass Bill No. 30-10. Amending the Human Rights <br />Ordinance will give the Commission the ability to respond to allegations of employment <br />discrimination, investigate such reports, and assist individuals when evidence of <br />discrimination is found. He stated that he realizes that the impact of this legislation may <br />be a concern on the Commission’s budget. On the basis of statistics from other cities that <br />have adopted similar amendments, the adoption of this legislation is not expected to have <br />a significant impact on the Commission’s budget. Any additional expenses are likely to <br />be due to updating forms and educating the staff and community about this change. I <br />have initiated discussions to enlist the cooperation of individuals in the community who <br />would assist in the educational process on a pro-bono basis, should the amendment pass. <br />He thanked the Council for their careful attention to this matter. He appreciates the effort <br />in helping to ensure equal employment opportunity for all individuals in South Bend. He <br />urged the Council to continue to make the City of South Bend a proactive City. <br /> <br />Penny Hughes, Chairperson, South Bend Human Rights Commission, residing at 1918 <br />Southernview Drive, South Bend, Indiana, stated that she has spoken before on this topic. <br />She stated that the Commission’s view is that they want everyone to be able to go to <br />work and not be discriminated against regarding their sexual orientation or gender <br />identity. She stated that the Council is going to hear tonight that GOD wants them to <br />change. Ms. Hughes stated that she believes that GOD doesn’t make mistakes and loves <br />diversity and recognizes that everyone deserves the right to go to work and not be <br />discriminated against. She urges the Council to vote in favor of Bill No. 30-10 <br /> <br />The following individuals spoke in favor of this bill: <br /> <br />Mr. Kent Hull, 238 S. Hawthorne Drive, South Bend, Indiana, stated that his an Attorney <br />and an adjunct faculty member of the Notre Dame Law School. He stated that he <br />strongly supports Bill No. 30-10 because it has merit and is worthy of passage by the <br />Council. He stated that he attended the committee meeting this afternoon and there was <br />good dialogue that took place, however, some Councilmember’s questioned for more <br />discussion and clarity on some points that were vague to them. Mr. Hull stated that the <br />bill is sufficiently clear and not just invented; it was drawn from other cities and drafted <br />from experience of other cities. He stated that he accepts the fact if the Council still has <br />questions and would like to delay this bill until all those questions have been answered. <br />He stated that this bill is needed and works to help contribute to the health of the <br /> 4 <br /> <br />