My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/04/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
02/04/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2011 4:14:44 PM
Creation date
11/24/2010 4:33:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
2/4/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OR <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />FEBRUARY 4, 1980 <br />letter that he was presently employed at Mishawaka Plating Company, <br />but has found it necessary to seek a second job in order to <br />support his family. She indicated that it was her impression <br />that he has performed his job in a responsible and satisfactory <br />manner. Mr. Stratton's extensive prior record was referred to <br />by Ms. Mann, but she pointed out that the majority of the <br />traffic offenses occurred prior to 1971. <br />It was noted that Ms. Mann had been present at the start of the <br />Board meeting but had been called back to her office. Deputy <br />City Attorney Terry Crone indicated that the Board did not <br />want to embarrass Mr. Stratton but felt it was necessary to <br />question him concerning the several convictions listed on his <br />application form. He stated that the most recent conviction <br />was conspiracy for theft. He asked about the conviction, and <br />Mr. Stratton indicated that he had purchased three television <br />sets and re -sold them and had been under the impression that <br />they were from a bankruptcy sale. He had been found guilty <br />but had pleaded to the lesser charge. Mr. Crone asked about the <br />reckless driving charge. Mr. Stratton indicated that he had <br />not been operating the vehicle. Mr. Crone asked about any other <br />traffic - related charges or offenses, and Mr. Stratton indicated <br />that, in 1955, he had been convicted of involuntary manslaughter <br />and had pleaded guilty to negligent homicide. The incident involved <br />an automobile accident, and Mr. Stratton indicated that he had not <br />been drinking but had gone through an amber light and hit a vehicle <br />which was turning at that intersection. Mr. Crone asked about <br />the armed robbery charge, and Mr. Stratton indicated that he <br />had robbed a service station in Elkhart. He stated that he had <br />not used a gun. Mr. Crone asked about the three counts of <br />burglary, and Mr. Stratton indicated that he had been found <br />guilty of all three counts. He admitted burglarizing three <br />business establishments. Mr. Crone referred to the firearms <br />violation, and Mr. Stratton explained that he had been operating <br />a service station in Indianapolis and had been carrying a gun. <br />He stated that he had not used it, but was hitchhiking one <br />evening and was stopped by policemen and the gun was discovered. <br />Mr. Crone asked if there were any other charges or convictions, <br />and Mr. Stratton indicated that there were not. <br />Mr. Hill indicated that the letter from Ms. Mann was very supportive <br />of Mr. Stratton, and it appeared that he was performing well in <br />his present employment. He stated that there were a number of <br />serious offenses which involved the use of automobiles. He <br />indicated that, although there was a period of time without <br />additional offenses, the most recent offense occured in 1979, <br />and he felt he would be somewhat reluctant to approve the taxi <br />license in view of that. He stated that, although his probation <br />officer felt Mr. Stratton would avoid future problems, he was <br />hesitant to approve the license at this time. He asked Mr. <br />Stratton to consider re- applying after some additional time had <br />passed in light of his recent conviction. He felt he would <br />like to see Mr. Stratton complete his period of probation, and <br />he felt the Board should not grant the license at this time in <br />view of that. Mr. Crone asked if Mr. Stratton had any comments <br />to make on his behalf, and Mr. Stratton indicated that he did not. <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Mr. McMahon and <br />carried, the application was denied. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.