Laserfiche WebLink
'Area Board of Zoning Appeals -October 6, 2010 <br />MS. MICHELLE WILSON: I live at 1718 Bader Ave. which is about two blocks away from where the <br />Crimmins live. I've been residing at that address for over 30 years. I'm a block captain for my <br />neighborhood. I know everybody who lives in my neighborhood. Not only know their names, I know their <br />pets names so I would just like to say that at this time that everybody that I've spoken to about the Crimmins <br />addition have approved it whole heartily. We have a neighborhood that really, it` s a very mixed <br />neighborhood but we are one community. We all are looking out for one another. Really and anyone who <br />makes improvements to the homes in our neighborhood we are so grateful and so thankful that they are <br />investing on the northeast side. I mean seriously when we have our windows open, sometimes in the <br />summer you can hear gunfire and the fact that someone wants to make an investment in our neighborhood <br />and wants to make improvements to homes in our neighborhood knowing that, you all know, I know you all <br />are living in our community, you know what's going on like at Club 23. You heard about the holdups on <br />Twyckenham. People who are even just walking home late at night on Twyckenham get held up. We all <br />are looking out for one another and the fact that Joe and Kathy want to take care of their father, a member of <br />the greatest generation, that they want to take care of their son so that he doesn't have to be put in group <br />home or institutionalized, this is why they're making this improvement to their home so that when he gets <br />older and granted he's still young, there's that option for them. They want to take care of their family and <br />isn't that what we are all here, you know, really as a community to help and support one another. So I just, <br />that's my feeling on it and I just wanted to express my feeling and most of my neighbors feel the same way <br />as I do. <br />REMONSTRANCE <br />There was no one present to speak in remonstrance of this petition. <br />A motion to send the Special Exception the City Council with a Favorable Recommendation with the <br />condition that the two units would be considered as a single unit for purposes of allowable occupancy was <br />made by Mr. Phipps and seconded by Mr. Hawley. The motion carried unanimously. <br />A motion for approval of the variances subject to the Special Exception being approved was made by Mr. <br />Phipps and seconded by Mr. Matthys. The motion carried unanimously. <br />After hearing the evidence on the petition, the Area Board of Zoning Appeals find that you did satisfy <br />the Standards as set forth in I.C. 36-7-4-918.5; therefore, the petition for Special Exception with <br />conditions was sent to the City Council with a Favorable Recommendation and the petition for <br />variances granted subject to the Special Exception being approved by the City Council. <br />Based on the testimony presented, the Area Board of Zoning Appeals, after careful consideration, finds this <br />Special Exception is sent to the Common Council with conditions with a Favorable Recommendation and <br />the petition for variances granted subject to the Special Exception being approved by the Common Council <br />and will issue written Finding of Facts. <br />SPECIAL EXCEPTION SENT TO THE COMMON COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE <br />RECOMMENDATION WITH CONDITIONS <br />PETTION FOR VARIANCES GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION BEING <br />APPROVED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL <br />42 <br />