Laserfiche WebLink
6.4. After the Commission prepared the CRP, the Commission drafted an Analysis of <br />Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives ( "ABCA ") dated May 2010, which includes information about <br />the Property and contamination issues (i.e., exposure pathways, identification of contaminant <br />sources, etc.); cleanup standards; applicable laws; alternatives considered; and the proposed <br />cleanup. The ABCA includes effectiveness, implementability, and the cost of the cleanup <br />proposed. The ABCA was made available for review and public comment for a period of no less <br />than 15 days from the first date of publication of the public notice. <br />6.5. Following the public comment period described above, in which no public <br />comments were received, the Commission prepared a document describing the final analysis of <br />brownfield cleanup alternatives (the "Decision Memo "). The Decision Memo included a <br />statement that the Commission did not receive any public comments on the ABCA and selected <br />the remedial approach proposed in the ABCA. The EPA approved the Decision Memo on June <br />17, 2010. <br />6.6. After the ABCA was finalized, the Commission prepared a scope of work <br />containing detailed design and construction plans and specifications for the Remediation Work <br />including a budget and work schedule; a health and safety plan (OSHA 1910 -120 —126) and a <br />quality assurance project plan which sets forth the manner and method of collecting samples to <br />assure the complete removal of all hazardous substances that are located at the Property and are <br />to be removed as a part of the Remediation Work (collectively, such documents are referred to as <br />the "Project Documents ") and has submitted same to the City for approval. <br />6.7. Prior to the initiation of the Remediation Work, including any cleanup activities, <br />the Commission must provide to the City copies of all of the state required remedial planning <br />documents and the state's approval of those documents, if required. <br />6.8. The awarding of this Grant shall be subject to: <br />6.8.1. Opinion of the Commission's counsel that the Commission is in good <br />standing and that all documents executed by the Commission are valid and enforceable in <br />accordance with their respective terms. <br />6.8.2. Approval of this Agreement by the Commission, agreeing to its terms and <br />authorizing the Commission to accept the Project Grant Funds. <br />6.8.3. Evidence by the Commission that no outstanding taxes, fees, charges, <br />mortgages, liens, encumberances or other assessments have been filed or are recorded <br />against the Property. <br />6.8.4. Evidence of insurance coverage with limits of liability as determined by <br />the City's Project Manager. All insurance coverage required by this section shall remain <br />in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. <br />6.8.5. Identification of the prime contractor and subcontractor(s) selected by the <br />Commission for the Remediation Work. <br />71 <br />