My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6D(8) Brownfields Grant Agreement - former Studebaker Stamping Plant
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Agendas & Packets
>
2010
>
07-23-10 Packet
>
6D(8) Brownfields Grant Agreement - former Studebaker Stamping Plant
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 10:07:30 AM
Creation date
7/21/2010 9:38:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
H. The City and the Commission carried out all appropriate inquiries into the <br />previous ownership and uses of the Property in accordance with generally accepted good <br />commercial and customary standards and practices. <br />I. On June 3, 2010, the EPA notified the City that they agreed with the City's <br />Hazardous Waste Site Eligibility Determination and that the Property is a Brownfield Site and <br />the Commission is not a Potentially Responsible Party ( "PRP "), as that term is used in, and in <br />connection with, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act <br />(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. <br />J. The Property was formerly a manufacturing site and is considered a Brownfield <br />site, under applicable State law, until such time as the Remediation Work is complete. <br />K. The Property is not listed, or proposed for listing on the National Priorities List of <br />the EPA. <br />L. The Commission is not a generator or transporter of any waste or hazardous waste <br />located at the Property. <br />M. The Commission is not and has never been subject to any penalties resulting from <br />environmental non - compliance at or on the Property nor is the Commission, or, to the best of its <br />knowledge, its project contractors or subcontractors currently suspended, debarred, or otherwise' <br />declared ineligible for participation in this federal program or from the receipt of these funds. <br />N. A claim has not been asserted against the Commission for liability under Section <br />107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Section 9607. <br />O. The Commission is not a Potentially Responsible Party under Section 107 of <br />CERCLA, 42 USC Section 9607, because the Commission has documented the BFPP defense to <br />CERCLA liability through materials submitted to EPA. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained <br />herein, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties as follows: <br />1. Incorporation of Recitals. The parties hereby expressly incorporate each of the <br />foregoing recitals (Recitals A through O) as if fully set forth in this section. <br />2. Grant Funds. <br />2.1. The City agrees to grant to the Commission a sum to be used by the Commission <br />for the Remediation Work and eligible consultant fees associated with the Remediation Work <br />(the "Project Grant Funds "), not to exceed the remaining amount of funds granted to the City <br />from the EPA on January 19, 2010, pursuant to Cooperative Agreement No. 2B — OOE97101 -1 <br />(the "EPA Funds "). The Project Grant Funds shall be distributed and used in accordance with <br />the terms and conditions in this Agreement. Once all of the EPA Funds have been allocated, the <br />Commission shall be solely responsible for any additional costs related to the Remediation <br />Work. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.