Laserfiche WebLink
Tuesday February 26.1924. <br />Continued.: <br />12.- That the improvement, as.provided in said resolution, is im <br />practicable and unjust to this remonstrator and.to the industries and various <br />plae,es_served by this remonstrator by side`track.in the area included -in the <br />track elevation provided by said resolution,.for the reason that in filing the <br />the elevation of said tracks o,f this remonstrator over the intersecting streets <br />affected by said proposed improvement, said improvement deprives the New York <br />CenTral Railroad Company of the opportunity to send. raeles in an $ onomi al <br />and efficient manner and the manufacturi itea! sts:n ind�wr, �ocettecd <br />within the ;.area of t ie. improvement, 'of their 'present sidetrack connections and <br />would, subject this remonstrators'and each of said industries, to heavy and un-�.- <br />raasonable expense in rebuilding the several i respective plants and side tracks <br />to secure practical railway cohneetigns, and'in many.instances such railway con- <br />nections will be absolutely destroyed; IbAt said proposed by said resilu�tion will <br />destroy the present team track facilities of. this remonstrator. <br />1i. That said proposed improvement,.if made .will -so alter and change <br />the grade of the tracks of said remonstrator from both t-ast and Wiest to and upon <br />said improvement that it �dll be impossible for this remonstrator to operate over <br />said grades the freight trains and passenger trains which are now operated by <br />this remonstrator and wl(ieh this remonstrator does now and intends to and will <br />operate in the future, and that said proposed improvement will so increase the. <br />I both from the East and West so that the length of trains and Lonna a now. <br />'operated by this remonstrator must, #J necessity be seriously reduced t§ the <br />great and irreparable injury of the public and of this remonstrator, 411-of which <br />said freight is being carried in interstate commerce. <br />14. This remonstrator further remonstrates against said: resolution <br />and objects as to the work provided therein upon the ground and for'the reason <br />that when said resolution was adopted there was not and is not now any law <br />authorizing or empowering the City od gouth Band or the Board of Public Works <br />of said City to,ppass and adopt said resolution, requiring this remonstrator to <br />elevate ito tracks, and to do the work or any part of the work required by said - <br />res0lution, and there is not -now and was not at the time of the adoption of said <br />resolutionoany authority vasted'in said. City, or its Board of Public Works, by <br />law or -otherwise, to require this remonstrator to elevate its tracks as provided <br />in said resolution. <br />15. This.ramonstrator further objects and remonstrates against said <br />said resolution, and the separation of grades as provided therein, for the reason <br />that the same imposes a burden -upon this remonstrator as a carrier of interstate <br />.traffic not authorised by law. <br />16. That the improvement as provided in said rasolution,.will eonfial <br />cafe and will take the property of this remonstrator withatt Niue process of law. <br />17• that the improvement proposed by said resolutions and the pro- <br />ceedings thereunder, will take the property of this remonstrator without just <br />compensation. <br />18. That the improvement as provided in said resolution, if carried <br />out, -will result in the confiscation"of property, rigghts and franchises of this <br />remonstrator, for which it cannot be compensated in damages. <br />That if the elevation of the tracks is required "to be msde, as pro- <br />vided for in the proceedings now pending, the curve where the Kankakee line or <br />Illinois Division of said Railroad system, joins the main line of.said remon- <br />strator's tracks will constitute such"a curve as is equivalent to a grade of thin <br />ty-two (32) percent; that: said construction proposed by said preliminary reso- <br />lutioo( anew the proceedings provided for, are Of such a abaracter as to make <br />said curve impractical and impossible to the eXtent that said curve will unduly <br />interfere with and hinder the reasonable operation of said remonstrator's rail- <br />road, and its trains engaged in inter and cross state commerce. <br />n That this remonstrator -and its predecessor in title has for more than <br />thirty (30) years last past been.expendin large. sums of money in the reduction <br />Of grades and curves to t4a extent that ifs grades or equivalents are not now <br />greater than four-tanths (4/10 of one (1) percent all of which is essential <br />,&nd necessary in railroad operation, and especially in the operation'of the rail- <br />maae of „this remonstrator in the manr it has operated for many years last past, <br />WUREFORE For each of the several Specifications above set -out, this <br />remonstrator objects and remonstrates against said improvement,' resolution for <br />.grade separation of streets and tracks and the elevation of tracks in the City of <br />South' Bend as herein set uut. <br />NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY <br />Bertrand WALKER <br />John GAvit <br />Yeaglay & Wolfe <br />Attys for Remoras. <br />