Laserfiche WebLink
222 <br />Wednesday., October. !h., . V928. <br />I <br />To the Board of Public A".rks., <br />South Bend, Indiana. <br />Gentlemen: <br />October 26th. , I926 <br />ou.have complied splendidly with my insistant demands I <br />throughout the last nine months that you economize and save constantly with respect <br />bo all city expenditures but hereafter necessity requires that you cut to the, <br />very bone. <br />A pre -election pledge to the public is not to be spoken <br />and then forgotten. Our pledge furnished a prime reason for my insistance <br />pon a course of economy. But a second very important reason was the fact <br />that the common council last year reduced t1­e general fund tax levy fcr this <br />year in the rather extreme amount of four cents, thus supplying a much less <br />income from taxes this year, and obliging some very close figuring to defray <br />the city's operating expenses for the year. <br />While the City spent last year.$I,237,000.00, we were <br />provided this year a total estimated income of but I,I4I,000.00.- Including <br />the gasoline tax, which comes from the state, the total is $I,I66,000.00, or <br />a total income of $71.000400 less than was spent last year'. It is gratifying:.: <br />to=: know that you have spent, or will by the end of the year, considerably less <br />this year than last, notwithstanding the greater developement and activity in <br />the city during this year than ever before. <br />It should be said in full justice, that the Common. <br />Council of last year is not to be censured for tbducirg--the levy for• this year <br />as it did, since it might have been a fair assumption that things would be <br />slower this year in South Bend and less money would therefore, be needed. It <br />simply happened that things. -did not slow down, but the very contrary occured, <br />even though we did save in pity :expenditures.. It is to 'th.e credit of three <br />members of the council of last year, who were re-elected, that they voted <br />unanimous approval of the buget presented for next year. Nine of the ten <br />members were present on that evening, and the entire nine, after full consider- <br />tion, voted affirmatively for the buget, without an objection. <br />A growing, enlarging city naturally increaces the cost <br />of city government, or maintenance. In IM the net disbursements of the <br />city amounted to 478,000.00. By I925 it had riseb to the figure, above <br />stated, of I.237,000.00, or an average yearly increase of $I08,000.00. With <br />all of the expansion and growth of the City this year, we accomplished an <br />actual decrease. . <br />We have track elevation on our hands, which will mean <br />large bond issues .in the near future, notwithstanding the cost is materially <br />reduced by combining the two elevations in one. The bonded indebtedness of <br />the city in the last few years has leaped upward at a rapid rate. In I9I8 <br />the total bonded debt o the City stood at 435,500.00. In I925 the debt <br />climbed to 3,078,000.00 or an average increase yearly of #232,000.00. <br />The present indebtedness, together with the necessary <br />additional debt to come with track elevation, presented a condition for serious <br />reflection. It impelled a course, as we believed, of resorting to bond issues <br />as sparingly as possible_ for a few years, due to the two percent. constitutional!: <br />limit, which we were rapidly approaching. It would be unwise to approach the <br />constitutional limit too closely. <br />Deciding upon such a course, though denying the city <br />as a consgquence, of certain needs, no bonds whatever, were issued this year, <br />the first time in eight years that no City bonds have been issued for city <br />expenses. <br />No one will deny the growth and activity that occured <br />in South Bend this year. Noo-ne-Muld foreenst at this time, -less growth and <br />developement for next year. et the council, urged to continue economy of <br />expenditures, actually dixed a budget, or total appropriations, for next year <br />in a less amount that the total ^ppropriations for this year. <br />Last Friday, the State Tax Board acted upon a petition <br />objecting to the tax levy as fixed by council for nextm which stated as the <br />reason for such objection "That the amounts to be collected on the levies so <br />fixed are more than government economically admistered warrants". The Board's <br />order reduced the levy a full four cents. <br />It is possible to carry the denial of pity needs and <br />improvements to a point where it ceaces to become a virtue. .hIready in our <br />first nine months, warnings have been received, Fnd from conservative <br />sources, that we are holding down city expenditures too closely for the city's <br />best welfare. <br />At the recent hearing before the Mate Tax. Board, I, <br />urged, asimpre.ssively as I knew how against VL red tion f t e inting <br />out that our present.indebtedness, iogeth.er with a large rae e��v ti8fi <br />• <br />C] <br />