222
<br />Wednesday., October. !h., . V928.
<br />I
<br />To the Board of Public A".rks.,
<br />South Bend, Indiana.
<br />Gentlemen:
<br />October 26th. , I926
<br />ou.have complied splendidly with my insistant demands I
<br />throughout the last nine months that you economize and save constantly with respect
<br />bo all city expenditures but hereafter necessity requires that you cut to the,
<br />very bone.
<br />A pre -election pledge to the public is not to be spoken
<br />and then forgotten. Our pledge furnished a prime reason for my insistance
<br />pon a course of economy. But a second very important reason was the fact
<br />that the common council last year reduced t1e general fund tax levy fcr this
<br />year in the rather extreme amount of four cents, thus supplying a much less
<br />income from taxes this year, and obliging some very close figuring to defray
<br />the city's operating expenses for the year.
<br />While the City spent last year.$I,237,000.00, we were
<br />provided this year a total estimated income of but I,I4I,000.00.- Including
<br />the gasoline tax, which comes from the state, the total is $I,I66,000.00, or
<br />a total income of $71.000400 less than was spent last year'. It is gratifying:.:
<br />to=: know that you have spent, or will by the end of the year, considerably less
<br />this year than last, notwithstanding the greater developement and activity in
<br />the city during this year than ever before.
<br />It should be said in full justice, that the Common.
<br />Council of last year is not to be censured for tbducirg--the levy for• this year
<br />as it did, since it might have been a fair assumption that things would be
<br />slower this year in South Bend and less money would therefore, be needed. It
<br />simply happened that things. -did not slow down, but the very contrary occured,
<br />even though we did save in pity :expenditures.. It is to 'th.e credit of three
<br />members of the council of last year, who were re-elected, that they voted
<br />unanimous approval of the buget presented for next year. Nine of the ten
<br />members were present on that evening, and the entire nine, after full consider-
<br />tion, voted affirmatively for the buget, without an objection.
<br />A growing, enlarging city naturally increaces the cost
<br />of city government, or maintenance. In IM the net disbursements of the
<br />city amounted to 478,000.00. By I925 it had riseb to the figure, above
<br />stated, of I.237,000.00, or an average yearly increase of $I08,000.00. With
<br />all of the expansion and growth of the City this year, we accomplished an
<br />actual decrease. .
<br />We have track elevation on our hands, which will mean
<br />large bond issues .in the near future, notwithstanding the cost is materially
<br />reduced by combining the two elevations in one. The bonded indebtedness of
<br />the city in the last few years has leaped upward at a rapid rate. In I9I8
<br />the total bonded debt o the City stood at 435,500.00. In I925 the debt
<br />climbed to 3,078,000.00 or an average increase yearly of #232,000.00.
<br />The present indebtedness, together with the necessary
<br />additional debt to come with track elevation, presented a condition for serious
<br />reflection. It impelled a course, as we believed, of resorting to bond issues
<br />as sparingly as possible_ for a few years, due to the two percent. constitutional!:
<br />limit, which we were rapidly approaching. It would be unwise to approach the
<br />constitutional limit too closely.
<br />Deciding upon such a course, though denying the city
<br />as a consgquence, of certain needs, no bonds whatever, were issued this year,
<br />the first time in eight years that no City bonds have been issued for city
<br />expenses.
<br />No one will deny the growth and activity that occured
<br />in South Bend this year. Noo-ne-Muld foreenst at this time, -less growth and
<br />developement for next year. et the council, urged to continue economy of
<br />expenditures, actually dixed a budget, or total appropriations, for next year
<br />in a less amount that the total ^ppropriations for this year.
<br />Last Friday, the State Tax Board acted upon a petition
<br />objecting to the tax levy as fixed by council for nextm which stated as the
<br />reason for such objection "That the amounts to be collected on the levies so
<br />fixed are more than government economically admistered warrants". The Board's
<br />order reduced the levy a full four cents.
<br />It is possible to carry the denial of pity needs and
<br />improvements to a point where it ceaces to become a virtue. .hIready in our
<br />first nine months, warnings have been received, Fnd from conservative
<br />sources, that we are holding down city expenditures too closely for the city's
<br />best welfare.
<br />At the recent hearing before the Mate Tax. Board, I,
<br />urged, asimpre.ssively as I knew how against VL red tion f t e inting
<br />out that our present.indebtedness, iogeth.er with a large rae e��v ti8fi
<br />•
<br />C]
<br />
|