My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/28/1935 Board of Public Works Special Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1935
>
02/28/1935 Board of Public Works Special Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2024 10:22:21 AM
Creation date
2/22/2018 9:44:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
2/28/1935
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Special meeting._ February 281, 1935 <br />This be ing the date set for the hearing of remonstrances against the assessment roll <br />and awarding of damages in the matter of condemnation resolution No.. 2481, being the <br />opening of Michigan St, between forth Shore Drive and the North City limits, "the <br />Board was called to order by Chairman Fred Anderson_ at the hour advertised, namely <br />three P. M. Fred Woodward was absent. <br />Mr. Chas. W. Hahn, in behalf of his client, presented a remonstrance in. the matter <br />of lot #15 and stated that with the project and the closing of Peashway Sts this <br />lot would be entirely, isolated and tenant would have no way of exit . from the proper- <br />ty except through an alley to the west and north. Mr. Anderson stated that it is <br />not known that Peashway St. would be closed and therefore it cannot be determined <br />at this time that this lot would be isolated. Mr. Percy Walsh stated that his <br />understanding was that if the project was completed the result would be that this <br />lot would be 14 feet above the street grade. <br />Mr. -Emil Schinke remonstrated along the same lines in regard to lots No. 11 & 12 <br />A representation of the Souther Michigan Ry. , Co. against the use of their name in <br />connection with these proceedings as it is the property and tracks of- the Northern <br />Indiana Ry. that was affected by this project. <br />Mr. George Beemer appeared before the Board representing Mr. Samuel Leeper and Mrs. <br />Eleanor D. McErlain and claimed that on the basis of taking 11,636.8 square feet <br />from the property of Mr. Leeper the amount caf damages allowed would be at 150 per <br />square foot and that on other property the allowance has been on the basis of 200 <br />per square foot and that the property on which 200 was being allowed was vacant and <br />Mr. Leeper's was improved, it was eminently an. unfair allowance. As the new street <br />will come within two feet of his garage it will have to be moved or torn down. He <br />also stated that the private drain fr cm the house will have to be torn up for which <br />an allowance of $150.00 has been made which is entirely inadequate as a new drain <br />outlet could not be establis+hed at that figure. Mr. Wisner of the Prudential Life <br />Insurance Co. stated the new highway would put Mr. Leeper's house within 23 feet of <br />the retaining wall which would. necessitate tearing down the rear part of the house <br />and putting on two wings at an expense of $5,500.00. He also stated that the rental <br />value would be impaired. Mr. Jackson, the. present tenant, stated he would be <br />r�bT-ige .to move his family as he would not subject his children to the hazards that <br />W�ad. develop. Mr. Samuel Leeper further referred to the inadequacy of the allow- <br />en�ce-made for removing the drain. Mr. Taylor, real estate operator, stated that <br />a tti-n off the. rear of this lot would move the roadway too close to the house and <br />would ir--pa r the property from present ma rke t value 33%.' YX. Beame r asked him what <br />he considered the market value at this time and he stated to anwilling seller it <br />-would be $12,000 and to an unwilling seller it would be $15,000, so that the sale <br />value is reduced about $5,000. He stated the reduction of the land if the house <br />were not on it would not be this percentage as house could then be built to suit the <br />lot. Again, Mr. Beemer brought up the unfair allowance of 150 per square foot on <br />improved property as compared with unimproved at 20¢ per square foot. Walter <br />Clements attorney for the Home Owners' Loan Corporation. stated he had a mortgage for <br />$8,400 on the Leeper property and any allowances or awards made must first apply on <br />the HOLC loan. <br />Mr. Beamer then brought up the question of the McErlain property and stated that the <br />brick garage would be right on the new line end would have to be moved. An allowanc <br />has been made of $1,000 for this. Contractors advise it could not be rebuilt for <br />less than $1,200. He stated the same facts that applied to the Leeper property as <br />to allowance for land taken applied in the case of the McErlain property. <br />It was regularly moved, seconded and carried that the proceedings of this meeting <br />be taken under advisement and hearing continued until April 15th, 1935 at 10:30 A.M. <br />The Board now took up Vacation Resolution #2482 being the vacation of Leeper Ave. <br />from the north line of Angela Blvd. to the north city limits, and continued the <br />hearing until April 15, 1935 at 10:30 A. M. <br />Meeting adjourned at 4:00 P. M. <br />Attest Clerk <br />• <br />i <br />0 <br />•. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.