My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12.19.17 SBACC Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Animal Welfare Commission
>
MEETINGS
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2017
>
12.19.17 SBACC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 10:19:24 AM
Creation date
2/16/2018 10:19:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
12/19/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Campbell suggested members review Ordinance on their own for things they <br /> are concerned about. <br /> Mr. Galos asked if Aldridge case involved seeking a warrant. Ms. Kaiser <br /> indicated questions about whether orders of commission are ordered. Mr. Galos <br /> indicates he ran into animal control officer who indicated they were seeking a <br /> warrant. Ms. Steele indicates they are not prepared to address issue. Ms. Leavell <br /> asked about dates on citations. Ms. Gobel indicates that has been addressed as it is <br /> noted when violation occurred. Mr. Wilkerson indicates that is a flaw in Ordinance <br /> that number of days to respond conflicts with other deadlines. Ms. Gobel indicates <br /> animal advocates will be very pleased with result of ordinance revamp. Mr. Galos <br /> asked if other ordinances are being looked at. Ms. Gobel said yes, from around the <br /> country. <br /> Ms. Campbell indicates on Lattimore case that appeal sought, but he asked <br /> for waiver of filing fee. That was denied but given more time to pay it by Court. <br /> Ms. Kaiser asked if animals cannot be seized until his appeal is allowed to proceed. <br /> Ms. Campbell indicated she does not think enforcement is affected. It is possible to <br /> give him a rehearing. Ms. Steele indicates SBACC is ok either way. They are <br /> prepared to present their case but acknowledge it is up to Commission to decide if <br /> decision stands. Mr. Galos asked if appeal successful, is it remanded to <br /> Commission. Ms. Campbell indicated he would get rehearing. If fee paid, <br /> Commission would have to defend decision. Ms. Gobel indicated her opinion that <br /> she would love to give him opportunity as she is confident in her case and would <br /> prefer to speed up process instead of waiting several months. Ms. Kaiser and Ms. <br /> Leavell indicate they would give Mr. Latimore a rehearing. Ms. Gobel indicates she <br /> is prepared to go tomorrow. Ms. Campbell indicated she would reach out to Mr. <br /> Latimore to give him that option if Commission acts to give him rehearing option. <br /> Ms. Kaiser and Ms. Leavell vote to rehear, Mr. Galos votes to let decision stand. <br /> Vote is 2-1 for giving Mr. Latimore rehearing. Ms. Campbell indicates she would <br /> reach out. <br /> Next meeting date discussed. Mr. Galos indicated Dr. Culp indicated 4t' or <br /> 11'were good dates for her. Ms. Gobel indicated 4th is too soon for her to have a <br /> hearing ready. Discussion about need to have hearing within 10 days of request. <br /> Date of January 18,2018 at 6:00 p.m. selected. Mr. Galos asked if meeting can be <br /> recorded in the room we use. Mr. Wilkerson indicated he would bring a recording <br /> device from Code hearings. Mr. Galos indicates he is recording them on his phone <br /> but it would be better for City to record hearings. Ms. Kaiser moves to adjourn, <br /> Ms. Leavell seconds, Motion passes 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:16 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.