My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Opening of Proposals - Utility Billing System - North Star Utilities Solutions - Part 2
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2018
>
Opening of Quotations/Proposals
>
Opening of Proposals - Utility Billing System - North Star Utilities Solutions - Part 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2025 8:51:51 AM
Creation date
1/24/2018 9:19:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Projects
Document Date
1/23/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NVORTHSTAR" <br />SECTION M. RFP INSTRUCTIONS <br />K. Liability <br />Vendor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City from all claims, suits actions, losses, damages, <br />liabilities, cost and expenses of any nature whatsoever resulting from, arising out of, or relating to the <br />activities of your company or its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents under the Purchase Order <br />resulting from this RFP. <br />Exception: Proposer's standard policy is to agrLe to defend the City against any third -party lawsuit alleging <br />violation of intellectual property right, or arising out of injuries to persons arising from the gross negligence <br />or` willful misconduct of Proposer and its employees, agents or independent contractors while on the <br />customer's prernises. Proposer will pay costs and damages that a court finally awards in such suit or that arc <br />agreed upon in settlement thereof. If the City or any third party has caused or contributed to a third -party <br />claim, then Proposer will only indernify the City up to the arnount Proposer is deemed responsible. In <br />accordance with industry standards, the indemnification should be balanced by a limitation of liability clause <br />to exempt both parties liability from indirect and consequential damages and to cap liability to a mutually <br />agreed upon amount, This cap on liability would not apply to Proposer''s intellectual properly <br />indemnification obligations, though Proposer's obligation to indemnify the City harmless under is void if the <br />clairn of infringement arises out of or in connection with arty modification made to the Software or any use <br />of the Software not specifically authorized in writing by Proposer. <br />SECTION VI. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS <br />9. Terms and Conditions <br />Vendor will provide standard agreements for all software services and maintenance and support needed to <br />provide the intended solution. The City reserves the right to reject any supplemental terms that are <br />requested by the Vendor but deemed by the City not to be in its best interest. Terms and conditions are <br />excluded from the total page count. <br />As a final note the Proposer anticipates that the resultant agreement shall be based on Proposer's and <br />industry norm standard agreements for software licensing and maintenance and that the resultant <br />agreement between the Proposer and the City should include provisions typically seen in these types of <br />software agreements, including: limitation of liability (which will be at one (1) times the contract value, and <br />shall not include damages related to indirect, consequential, special or aggravated), warranty (as per the <br />restrictions above), license use and restrictions (such as copying restrictions, User restrictions and reverse <br />engineering type restrictions), mutually acceptable acceptance terms, payment terms (including the use of <br />milestones for payment and license fees paid up front), maintenance terms, approved Statements of work, <br />and other provisions typical in software license/support/service agreements and that the absence of any <br />clauses in the City's RFP will not affect Proposer's ability to negotiate such clauses and to modify the standard <br />contract as needed. <br />NorthStar Proposal Response —South Bend Indiana <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.