Laserfiche WebLink
Committee Chair Davis requested to hear from the City Administration and have another <br /> discussion about this negotiation process on September 25, 2017. <br /> Councilmember Broden asked, What is the outcome with petitioners on all of this? What are the <br /> pros and cons on the petitioner's side of things? <br /> Mr. Bulot replied, In general, it results in better service. There have been so many times when <br /> petitioners have had to go back and forth across the street to get information. This streamlines <br /> the information as well as the point of entry. <br /> Councilmember Broden then asked, Earlier there had been brought up the expansion of the <br /> notification boundary and is this something we could tuck into that? <br /> Mr. Magliozzi replied, That is a separate issue. The County Council has gone ahead and <br /> authorized the expansion of notification boundary. The Common Council has not acted on that. <br /> That is a different discussion and can happen independent of this. However if this is to pass, <br /> there will be some changes to the ordinance you must subsequently pass. Specifically,to the <br /> interlocal agreement as well as the administrative responsibilities section. We may also change <br /> the meeting date to better serve the petitioners. <br /> Sue Kessim, 4022 Kennedy Drive, stated, I think it'is important to keep notifying neighbors in <br /> the surrounding area. <br /> With no further business, Committee Chair Davis adjourned the Zoning and Annexation <br /> Committee meeting at 4:10 p.m. <br /> R;er ,S 1 <br /> e Chair <br /> 4 <br />