Laserfiche WebLink
Monday, February 5th . , 1934 <br />507 <br />• <br />Board met in reguler session at 3 P. IT. I,"r. Dick Johnson and Mr. Ralph <br />Ii. Kuss present. Ik=r. "flilliam S. THY'oore, City Dnpineer, also present. <br />Yinutes of r-eeting held. Ivond ay', Janunry 29th. , 1934, read and approved. <br />The Board approved the renewal certificate for the excavation bond of <br />Distler Plumbing Uo. , of I4 ishawaka- Indiana, in the sum of l,000.00 signed by The <br />Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. <br />The -boa rd a:ppro ve d the I}xca. va ti on Bond of C . S. R,,nd olph in the sum o f <br />1,000.00 signed by Emplovers Liability Assurnnce Co. <br />The boa rd approved. the Excavation fond of Harvey L. Hager, Inc., in the <br />sum of `a1, 000.00 s i. gne d by The Aetna Cp su alty Company. <br />The .hoard approved the renejral certificate for the excavation bond of <br />Hobert L. Thorpe in the sum of *1,000.00 signed by A=etrapolitan Casualty Insurance <br />Company. <br />• Yr. Eli F. Seebirt, attorney, 1r. Louis Hammond, a ttorney, representing; <br />j ovmers of thirty seven different parcels of land which mere assessed for the pavement <br />Ij of Kline Street appeared before the Board, with Cit~, Attorney, S. Romig. Upon the <br />advise of Uity httorney Romig, the board agreed to a11ow the City of South Lend to <br />assume 50% of the total assessments on said thzifty setren parcels of land amounting to <br />. approximately ,,69b59.49, and in this way, settle the court appeals pending in the matter <br />of said assessments. <br />0 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />Copies of Court Orders are as follows: <br />I STATE OF IlM I A_I'A ) <br />)SS <br />`;T. TOS-1IT '70T71TY) <br />CLTRTTS `= 'TTY' CARL J . I! 17-OHS . ) <br />j ciBRIFAX COHEFI,Ja.cob Schrift . } <br />IS ^ _" C I'_AT E PARKS AT" D ) <br />VIOLET Y. P,ARKS ) <br />it <br />VS <br />C rmv OF SOT'�F BliIvD ) <br />No.31330 Order <br />Ili? ST. JOSEPN CIRCUIT C <br />FEVRU^.RY TERTA, 1934. <br />Come now the plaintiffs by thier arroneys, Seebirt, Oa.re, Deahl 8<, Omachut, <br />anc comes the defendant by its City '=ttorney, ld�"n S. Romig, and this cause is now sub- <br />mitted to the court for trial -nd hef=ring upon the amended complaint of the plaintiffs <br />and. upon the answer of the defendant, " nr the court now having heard the evidence anal be- <br />inp duly advised_ in the rremises, finds for -' <br />..the plaintiffs that the allegations of the <br />,mended complaint are true and they are entitled to the relief prayed for. And the <br />court further finds that the pl,-� int if fs are the owners respectively of the tracts and <br />parcels of land located in the citT of South bend, Indiana, described in the amended <br />cpTp�aint and set opposite each of their names, and th, court further finds that each <br />of zaid. tracts was as:�esed_ the sum set forth in the complaint opposite each of said <br />descriptions by the Bo-rd of Public Vorks of the City of South -bend, Indiana on the llth <br />dajs of ffebruary, 1930, as benefits for the pavement of Kline Street, now known as <br />Twyckenha.m Drive; and the court finds that each of said assessments is excessive and <br />that each of said parcels of land was not benefited in the amount assessed against it <br />by said Board, and that said assessments should be reduced. <br />And the court finds that the plaintiffs, whose names are given as follows, <br />,,a.re the owners respectively of the real estate set opposite <br />each of their <br />names herein - <br />rafter; that the original assessment as made by the Board. of <br />Public Works <br />is the dum <br />;'set opposite of each said descriptions in the first column <br />and that the corrected <br />essess- <br />ment and "the amount did' benefits to each of said parcels of <br />real esttte is <br />set opposite <br />;each. of saiddescriptions in the second and last column as <br />follows: <br />it <br />NAIT DESURIPTION OF PROPERTY <br />ASSESSITENT <br />ASSESSMENT <br />ANT <br />BY BD OF `'.'ORKS FIXED BY <br />COURT <br />;!Curtis Smith Lot ,i 12 in 17-ayrs Vistula <br />1. Ave Addition <br />413.59 <br />206.80 <br />Car 1 J. Emmons Lot 1'28 in 1-ay r's Vistula <br />Ave. Addition <br />390.19 <br />195.10 <br />J n c ob 19ohe n and <br />Jacob Schrift Lot ;#1 in Yayrs Vistula <br />Avenue Addition <br />585.84 <br />292.92 <br />;Jacob Cohen and <br />!Jacob Schrift Lot #,-2 in P.ayrs Vistull Avenue <br />Addition <br />447.38 <br />223.69 <br />It is therefore, ordered, considered end a d judged <br />that each <br />of the plain- <br />tiffs' said parcels of real estate is assessed in the sum contained in the <br />last column <br />11'above enc3 set opposite each cf said parcels as benefits for the laying of said pavement <br />