My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-17 Personnel and Finance
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2017
>
Personnel and Finance
>
10-23-17 Personnel and Finance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2018 2:45:39 PM
Creation date
1/8/2018 2:45:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
10/23/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
finishing up most of the normalization. There was a lot of discussion on this year's increases. <br /> There were many comparisons with other cities as well as the private sector. These are just the <br /> caps and they will not get right up to the maximum. <br /> Councilmember Davis followed up, So will they be budgeted for the maximum or the actual? <br /> Ms. Hockenhull replied, We will budget close the actual. <br /> Councilmember Davis followed up, I'm clear about that but that is where my concern comes in. <br /> It is very clear with the two percent (2%) raises. We have a wide range of increases and that is <br /> my concern. I think there are too many wide ranges for me to feel comfortable approving this. <br /> The rate we set for our salaries affect other entities and when those entities see these raises it <br /> affects them, and that is my concern. Many of us were not privileged to those comparisons and <br /> the benchmarking. What cities are we talking about? <br /> Ms. Hockenhull replied, We did provide explanations for the raises we are requesting in various <br /> formats. They were discussed in the public meetings. We may not have given specific <br /> comparisons for one (1) individual position. <br /> Councilmember Davis interrupted, That is what I am saying. Yes, you gave a presentation on it <br /> but when it comes to specific salaries,we had to really search them out and do our own <br /> homework. This happened last year. A lot of the focus last year was on the Clerk's salary but <br /> behind that was a lot of other positions that we had to go back and deal with. It appears there is a <br /> smokescreen. <br /> Ms. Hockenhull replied, We did provide summary information on Saturday regarding the <br /> specific questions that have been asked. If you have more specific questions I'm happy to get <br /> more information. <br /> Councilmember Davis interrupted,And that is my concern. At 6:25 a.m. on Saturday and I saw <br /> that come through in an e-mail. My concern is the turnaround time. To have these decisions,the <br /> email that gave us the information needs to be provided day one (1)before all the presentations. <br /> That is not fair. <br /> Ms. Hockenhull replied, I appreciate your comments. We will try to amend the budget process. It <br /> is an evolving process and will take your comments into consideration. <br /> Committeemember Voorde stated, I would like to thank John Murphy along with the Admin and <br /> Finance Office. I think the term transparency quickly becomes over-used. However, I see now <br /> the term is coming to fruition.Now more than ever, if you want to know something, you can find <br /> it and I think that is credit to all the departments. I think the departments are more professional <br /> now more than ever. Data-driven decision-making can leave me uneasy at times but there is still <br /> opportunity for human-input from both City employees and neighborhood organizations. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.