Laserfiche WebLink
Area Board of Zoning Appeals—December 6,2017 <br /> now and in sense maybe echoes my statement for the billboard earlier it's like come seeking a situation that is already <br /> bulky and amplifying it instead of doing what I think would, is the opposite of what we would want to do in this situation. <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: I share your feelings. I don't have any exception really with the Special Use. It's the parking. I'm not in <br /> favor of the variances for that reason. They can't have one without the other. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: As per my motion,as far, I think one and two, I don't struggle with that because we've been doing <br /> setback variances along Notre Dame Ave.,St. Pete,for three years or whatever,okay. You know we decide factors when <br /> we make decisions here and what each property is different,okay,I'm assuming and what I kind of know about the offices <br /> were two stories, it's not a continuation or a constant flow of traffic in and out of those and maybe you can ask the <br /> gentlemen who are partners in it. You know it's not a steady flow of people coming in and out, not many people coming. <br /> You said there was going to be somewhere around ten employees, if I recall correctly,... <br /> MR. MURPHY: There are ten currently. The idea is to grow over time. In respect to the use of it,yeah a lot of these <br /> people that are employed there travel,so they're not there 24/7. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Okay but is there a steady flow of traffic coming in and out daily other than the employees? <br /> MR. MURPHY: The answer to that is no. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: So then to begin with or look at eight to ten cars and possibly up to maybe fifteen or so which is still way <br /> under the 35 spaces required. Again in my opinion, it's supposed to be our opinion,yes were supposed to look at what <br /> comes in but we're also supposed to look at what we feel is best for the neighborhood and that's why I started out to <br /> making a motion to approve the variances. <br /> MRS.SMITH: So as it is right now we have a motion and we have not had a second? <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: We're waiting for a second. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Subject to... <br /> MRS.SMITH: Subject to the Special Exception being granted by the Council. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: And in doing so I know that I feel that I'm pushing this off and let the Common Council make the decision. <br /> We have to make the decision on the variances. I sometimes think that the City Council hardly doesn't even listen to what <br /> we recommend. That's my opinion. <br /> MR.CRUMLISH: Well I'll ask, is there a second to the motion? <br /> NO ONE MADE A SECOND TO MR. URBANSKI'S MOTION <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: I don't see a second. You motion dies for a lack of a second, Mike. <br /> MRS.SMITH: Maybe a motion on the Special Exception? <br /> MR. LESZCZYNSKI: Can we approve the variances without number three? <br /> 26 <br />