My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17-75 Special Exception 806 Howard Street
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2018
>
01-08-2018
>
17-75 Special Exception 806 Howard Street
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2018 1:55:35 PM
Creation date
1/4/2018 9:24:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Resolutions
City Counci - Date
1/8/2018
Bill Number
17-75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Carolyn Henry <br /> From: Jill Bodensteiner <jbodenst @nd.edu> <br /> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 8:57 PM <br /> To: Carolyn Henry <br /> Cc: James Haigh;Tom Mustillo;Jill.R.Bodensteiner.2 <br /> Subject: Zoning Appeal --806 Howard Street <br /> Dear Ms. Henry, <br /> My name is Jill Bodensteiner,and t live at 920 North St.Peter Street.Because my home is located within 300 feet of the property <br /> located at 806 Howard Street,I received the Notice to Adjacent Property Owners regarding the petition for seven(7)variances to zoning <br /> regulations filed by Pandora Partners LLC.Please forward this email detailing my opposition to such variances to the Area Board of Zoning <br /> Appeals for consideration. <br /> In light of the overwhelming concern expressed by my neighbors,l am certain that you have received several similar emails or letters.As <br /> such,my comments will be brief and focused on two of the legal standards governing the work of the Area Board of Zoning Appeals. <br /> Adverse Affect on Property Values in the Adjacent Area <br /> There is simply no credible argument to be made that the addition of an upstairs dwelling unit(and nearly 15 feet)to the existing structure <br /> and the reduction by 31 in the number of off-street parking spots will do anything other than adversely affect the property values in the <br /> adjacent areas.The site lines,skyline and residential feel of the entire neighborhood will change.I can't imagine a potential buyer of my <br /> bungalow home would want the structure two doors down to tower above their new home.The potential for 30+additional cars parking in <br /> front of our houses will also adversely affect the property value.Finally,any argument that the owner intends to improve the exterior <br /> appearance is irrelevant;to my knowledge,there is no related variance in the current petition. <br /> Consistent with the Character of the District <br /> The area surrounding 806 Howard Street is residential with the exception of the structure in question.While already zoned for office use,the <br /> addition of significant height and creation of a mixed use office/residential building will render the existing structure even more out of place <br /> and will establish bad precedent for the future of the neighborhood.An argument that either phases of the Eddy Street Commons project <br /> establishes 806 Howard as part of an existing mixed use district is without merit;a tour of the area would quickly establish the different <br /> character of our properties compared to Eddy Street Commons. <br /> In sum,I strongly opposed the zoning variances sought by Pandora Partners LLC related to 806 Howard Street,and look forward to the <br /> opportunity to share my views at the hearing. <br /> Jill Bodensteiner <br /> Senior Associate Athletics Director <br /> Notre Dame Athletics <br /> email:jbodenst nd.edu <br /> cell:(574)360-9792 <br /> office: (574)631-6721 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.