Laserfiche WebLink
VIP- <br />60 Tuesday, March I8th. , I930. <br />Board met in regular session at 9 A. 1.1. All members present. Minutes j <br />of meeting held March Ilth., 1930, read and approved. <br />i <br />The Board approved the estimate of Gerber and dale , Contractors, for <br />painting walls and. ceiling in thou Counc i 1 Chambers at the cost of 4458.00. <br />A proposal for the lease of the old South Bend Woolen Company property <br />on past LaSalle venue was filed by Hoe Scheininger as follows: <br />South Bend -,,Indiana. <br />Ia'arch I7th. , 1930. <br />• <br />To The Honorable Board Cf Public Vi orks <br />Uity of South Bend Indiana <br />, . <br />Gentle men : <br />The unde.F. signet represe�t�s that he is the owner of the fbllc�ri�g deserib <br />ed real estate in the City cf South Bend: <br />Lots numbered Your (4) and five (5) and six (6) in the Original Plat o f <br />the `T'won of Lowell <br />• <br />now a part of the City of South Bend, excepting therefrom a parcel <br />of land sixteen (t) rods in -length, taken off of and from the Entire width of the <br />east end of said. Lots, alsoLotsTwo, (°=2), three (3), and four (4), as shwon on the <br />recorded plat of Esther H. M11illerts subdivision of a Dart of Lots four (41''' five (5) <br />(6) <br />and six in the Original Plat of the Town of Loy; ell, nova a part of the 6ityof South <br />Bend . <br />The undersigned proposes to lease said real estate to the City of ''ouch <br />Bend for a public Parking for term (5) <br />ground, a. of five years, at an annual rental <br />of Fifty-two hundred dollars (5200.00) payable on July Ist. , and January Ist., of each G <br />year. It is proposed, also, that the City may have a renewal of said lease fora like <br />(5) <br />period of five years at the same rental. if desired It is understood that the <br />City <br />should accept the property in its presnt cond-�tion, and- Can make any improvements <br />on the real estate that it desires, with the privilege of removing any end all of its <br />improvements at the expiration of idle lease. <br />i' <br />The undersigned respectfully presents this proposal for the considena- <br />Lion of the Board. - <br />Fours very truly, <br />Joe Scheininger." 11 <br />petitions. regare'ing the assessments for track removal <br />The following <br />on Division Street were filed: <br />Board of Public Yorks <br />City of South Bend, Ind. <br />Re: Grand Trunk Tra ck -Removal peso lu `ion. <br />Gentlemen: <br />At a general meeting of the property owners along Division street, <br />the following reasons were advanced why the property owners should not pay more than • <br />10% of the bale -nee due on the Grand Trunk con tract for the removal of i is tracks on j <br />Division Street from Michigan street to Laurel Street: <br />I. The, Grand Trunk Railroad Compan-r never paid the adjoining or <br />abutting property owners along Division Street, cr the city for its right of way at <br />the time the tracks were laid. <br />'i <br />2. The tracks on-'ivision 'street for the past sixty years have lessen <br />ed the value of the property along said street and has materially hind ere d its detelope <br />merit. <br />3. The property owners in this section have suffered great inconveniana;e <br />in form of noise, smoke and delaYs by reason f trains <br />o being zun over said tracks at <br />all hours of the day and. night, <br />4. The city for the past sixty R CompanyRailroad for <br />its <br />right of way along said street, and said tax became a part of the general fund, and <br />was used for governmental purposes generally. The property owners on Division Street <br />derived no more benefit <br />from said tax than the property owners generally in the City. <br />5. The removal of the railroad tracks, while it is not in the nature <br />of a. public utility, was neve rthe less considered as a part of the track elevation <br />program an(_ should be paid by the city at large. <br />6. Studebakers, 'livers ,Wilson Bros., and other employees and the <br />City as a while derive a direct benefit by the removal of the tracks -and <br />the abandon - <br />me nt and surrender of the right of way. <br />