HPC Administrative Record - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

by failing to inform Mr. Boyd that his COA Application was processed and available for the public to inspect and failing to properly mail the notification of hearing to Mr. Boyd, the HPC violated the Indiana Anti-Secrecy Act and Access to Public Records Act; (4)that HPC violated its own standards and guidelines; and (5) that HPC failed to issue an individual exterior historic preservation plan for the Firehouse. These are generally spurious arguments, and not appropriate reasons for the Council to overturn HPC's denial of COA Application 2017-0602A. III. Argument A. Application No. 2017-0602A was barred by res judicata and thus correctly denied by HPC. Under Ind. Code § 36-7-11-4, a final decision of the HPC is subject to judicial review under Ind. Code § 36-7-4 as if it were a final decision of a board of zoning appeals. Therefore, appeals of HPC decisions should be treated in the same manner as if they were appeals from a zoning decision. The concept of res judicata applies to administrative proceedings, such as those before a zoning board or the HPC. Porter County Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Bolde, 530 N.E.2d 1212 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Generally, "'a zoning board should not indiscriminately or repeatedly reconsider a determination denying a variance absent a change of conditions or circumstances. If it were otherwise there would be no finality to such proceedings."' Id. The same principle applies to COA Applications. For zoning board decisions, "[R]emonstrators against subsequent [] petitions may successfully assert a defense in the nature of res judicata by merely establishing the fact of the prior denial unless the petitioner proves that there has been a change in the conditions, circumstances or facts which induced the prior denial." Easley v. Metropolitan Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 161 Ind. App. 501 (Ind. Ct. App. 1974). Because, under Ind. Code § 36-7-11-4, decisions of the HPC should be treated in the same manner on review as those of boards of zoning appeals, the same principle applies here. 6