Laserfiche WebLink
Clearly, HPC considered the financial hardship to Mr. Boyd extensively during the June <br /> 19, 2017 meeting in its consideration of COA Application 2017-0602A. The Commissioners <br /> made several attempts at describing projects which would be both architecturally appropriate and <br /> financially feasible to Mr. Boyd, and requested several times that he withdraw the current <br /> application and research other possible options, which he had failed to do between being denied <br /> for COA Application 2016-0809 and submitting Application 2017-0602A. HPC demonstrated <br /> its understanding of the financial issues and indicated a willingness to work with Mr. Boyd in <br /> determining an architecturally appropriate and financially feasible solution to the Firehouse roof. <br /> HPC clearly did its duty to consider financial hardship to Mr. Boyd when it denied COA <br /> Application 2017-0602A. <br /> For all of these reasons, HPC did not act outside of the authority granted to it by <br /> ordinance. It is granted the power to review and deny applications for a COA. HPC observed <br /> the procedures required by the applicable laws and thoroughly considered all applicable <br /> guidelines when making its decision. <br /> IV. Conclusion <br /> HPC acted in accordance with the City of South Bend Ordinances and HPC guidelines. <br /> Mr. Boyd's application was properly denied because it proposed modifications that had already <br /> been denied and such denial had been affirmed, and because the modifications proposed failed to <br /> conform to the architectural integrity of the Firehouse. The roof described in the COA, which <br /> has been built, destroys the historical value of the landmark. Accordingly, HPC respectfully <br /> requests that the South Bend Common Council deny Mr. Boyd's appeal and affirm HPC's <br /> decision to deny Mr. Boyd's application for a COA. <br /> 15 <br />