My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-17 Personnel and Finance
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2017
>
Personnel and Finance
>
07-24-17 Personnel and Finance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2017 8:18:20 AM
Creation date
8/15/2017 8:18:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
7/24/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Mueller confirmed, Yes, that was done in 2014. <br /> Councilmember Broden followed up, I also understand there were target areas? I assume that is <br /> an overlap? So what are we trying to find out in this proposed study that is different from that <br /> previous study? What's the intention here? There are the Downtown and the Westside Corridor <br /> studies, are those the two (2)that are in play right now? <br /> Mr. Mueller stated, We have created new impact areas that coincided with the one hundred (100) <br /> houses group and our team agreed upon the areas. After our meeting two (2) weeks ago, there <br /> were questions about expanding that area south of downtown. We want to know where the <br /> market is in these areas to figure out many things. One (1) of the things we hope to figure out is <br /> where the best investment could be both from the private market and the areas where the City <br /> could intervene to help push the market. The study is definitely broader and has expanded since <br /> the onset of the discussion, given the feedback we have received. We will start with the whole <br /> City market assessment and then start honing in on potential impact areas. The other issue given <br /> is that anything outside of the Federal funds, which are income-restricted for eligibility, the <br /> funding sources would likely be part of the General Plus Funds. These dollars would be <br /> competing with all of our other expenditures such as the Police Department, Fire Department and <br /> other operative funds within the City Government. We aren't likely going to be able to do one <br /> hundred (100) houses in five hundred (5 00) days, which was the original effort, but we are <br /> hoping to make a serious push and see how we can get more neighborhood development. <br /> Councilmember Broden followed up, So where does the 2014 study stand with regard to action <br /> steps? What has happened since then with regard to the recommendations to that report? <br /> Mr. Mueller replied, The Downtown Study showed there was a market for residential housing <br /> downtown and we had shifted resources toward those developments. That was easier to do <br /> because they were eligible for TIF dollars because a lot of them were mixed use. This study will <br /> help find the resources and help direct the resources to the impact areas. <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis arrived at the meeting at 4:17 p.m. <br /> Councilmember Scott stated, To me the 2014 study gave us partial data and this next study will <br /> give us more information. <br /> Mr. Mueller replied, We are trying to see how our existing housing studies will coincide with <br /> this market study. <br /> Councilmember Davis asked, In the 2014 study,there was a 50,000 number. Was that the <br /> number of houses or was it $50,0009 <br /> Mr. Mueller replied, The 2014 study yielded that number as the average annual income needed <br /> to afford the downtown housing options. <br /> Councilmember Davis followed up, Will this study have any stipulations like that? <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.