My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-2017 Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2017
>
05-22-2017 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2017 3:17:10 PM
Creation date
5/18/2017 3:11:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
If the Area planning commission grants the Echo's development , you are ignoring the <br /> interest ,concerns and livelihood of the people who actually live here and catering to the <br /> greed of the dishonest Matthew's development company who do not live in this <br /> neighborhood. They are going to benefit at our dismay <br /> Allowing this develop ment,only increases the onslaught of these types of developments <br /> in our neighborhood . If allowed this will allow the same type of development(s) to be <br /> constructed on Edison Rd., which will undoubtedly cause the eventual eminent domain <br /> issues causing people on Edison ,Oak Park Dr.,and Hartman Dr. to forced out of their <br /> homes ,being that they are smaller homes. People in these home cannot afford to be <br /> kicked out on the street by some developer that lives in Granger to profit from rich <br /> people that live out of state <br /> Allowing office buildings similar to the dental offices on Edison and Ironwood that <br /> already would be acceptable or building 6 houses that are in conformance to thole <br /> existing architecture could be considered possible too This was brought up at the <br /> meeting . A person stated that there are only 8 houses per side on Hartman Dr, "why <br /> can't you emulate the existing",that question was ignored and dismissed. The guy from <br /> Matthews conducting the meeting, was acting quite ignorant (to ignore) <br /> The Area Planning Commission needs to deny in full this development . By allowing <br /> it, you will prove that your are not concerned with what is best for the citizens of South <br /> Bend,or what they deem important,and only supporting the greed of the developers in <br /> this matter. <br /> WE HAVE STATED THAT WE DO NOT WANT THIS AT ALL, AND SHOULD <br /> NOT HAVE TO FIGHT AGAINST IT. <br /> THIS DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT FIT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE ARE <br /> NOT CONCERNED WITH MATHEW'S GREED ,INVADING OUR <br /> NEIGHBORHOOD, PERIOD., SO DO US A FAVOR,THE CITIZENS OF THIS <br /> CITY YOU REPRESENT . TELL THEM NO <br /> Thank you <br /> More than concerned citizen <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.