My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-17 Zoning and Annexation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2017
>
Zoning and Annexation
>
02-13-17 Zoning and Annexation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2017 11:00:07 AM
Creation date
4/25/2017 11:00:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
2/13/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Committee Chair Davis opened the floor of the committee to questions for Ms. Smith. <br /> Councilmember Karen White asked, Why no recommendation? <br /> Ms. Smith answered, There were only twelve (12)members present at the Area Plan <br /> Commission out of the fifteen(15)total members on the Commission. There was a motion made <br /> to send the bill to the full Council with an unfavorable recommendation,that motion failed to <br /> carry by a five (5)to seven(7)vote. There was then a motion made to send it to full Council with <br /> a favorable recommendation,that motion failed to carry by a seven(7) to five (5)vote. It <br /> requires eight(8)votes to accept a motion and receive a recommendation. <br /> Brian McMorrow, 750 Lincolnway East, stated, We've met with the neighbors twice since the <br /> last time we met here. Once, representatives of the development team were invited to a meeting <br /> hosted by the neighbors, and we also hosted a meeting at the German Township Library on <br /> February Wh. I think both sides earned a deeper respect for each other and this presentation I have <br /> presents the facts of the matter and seeks to strip away a lot of emotion from this issue. This is <br /> Bill No. 78-16, the Waggoner Dairy Farm Rezoning at Adams and Mayflower. The owner is <br /> Waggoner Dairy Farm Inc., and it has been in possession of the family since the 1940s. The <br /> developer is GLC Portage Prairie Three (3), not the same developer that made the petition in <br /> 2005. What is a PUD? By definition cited by code it"is a site to be developed, operated, and <br /> maintained as a single entity and containing one (1) or more residential areas,public areas, <br /> quasi-public areas, commercial areas, or industrial areas and containing a range of uses as <br /> specified in the PU district ordinance." They are set up on a case by case basis, as was the case in <br /> 2005. It's a petition made by the owners working in concert with the professional staff and the <br /> City to put in an appropriate vision for the development and operation of the property. It's not <br /> automatically Eddy Street Commons, although it could be. It's not automatically Toscana Park, <br /> although it could be. It's certainly not agricultural, which is the present condition of the land. <br /> The Portage Prairie PUD in 2005 was a plan to develop all four (4) quadrants of the intersection <br /> of Adams Road which runs east/west and the St. Joe Valley Parkway which runs north/south. <br /> The quadrants A, B, C, and D each had different visions. Quadrant A, the northwest quadrant, in <br /> 2005 had all of the uses in the PUD. If this petition for LI (Light-industrial) zoning is approved, <br /> there is no change to any of that. There was a big fear that if this petition were approved, <br /> automatically there is a domino effect to the other side of the parkway and that is simply not true. <br /> The PUD of 2005 has expired so effectively,there is no zoning in place. For Quadrant B, the <br /> southwest quadrant, in 2005 the Portage Prairie PUD anticipated neighborhood retail, <br /> medical/office campus, and assisted living. If this petition is approved, it doesn't change any of <br /> that. In Quadrant C,the southeast quadrant, in 2005 what was anticipated was Light-Industrial, <br /> commercial or hotel, and office and flex space. If this petition is approved, it doesn't change any <br /> of that. In fact,the development has commenced exactly as approved. Quadrant D is the one <br /> hundred and twenty (120) acres which is the subject of our petition. In 2005 it allowed <br /> hotel/restaurant park, research and development, opportunity site, and/or residential buffer yards <br /> along Adams road. If this petition is approved,most of those things don't change. What's not <br /> permitted is a hotel or a restaurant park and that is the one exception. The uses that are listed in <br /> LI includes most exactly what the PUD listed in 2005 and would not take away any possibility <br /> from the plan in 2005. What we are looking to do is develop the first twenty-eight(28) acres of <br /> the one hundred and twenty(120) acres on the northeast quadrant. It features the extension of <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.