Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Report <br />4. Conservation of Property Values: <br />4/6/2017 <br />With proper buffering, screening, and site design, adjacent property values should not be <br />adversely affected. <br />5. Responsible Development And Growth: <br />It is responsible development and growth to allow for the redevelopment of the site for <br />medium density residential supported by the pedestrian connection with Notre Dame. <br />Combined Public Hearing <br />This is a combined public hearing procedure, which includes a rezoning and 6 variances from <br />the development standards. The Commission will forward the rezoning to the Council with or <br />without a recommendation and either approve or deny the variances. <br />The petitioner is seeking the following variance(s): <br />1) from the requirement that the height and massing shall be no more than twice the height <br />and massing of the immediately abutting building to nine times the massing <br />2) from the requirement that all front doors and mailboxes be oriented toward and visible <br />from the primary street to allow for a stand -alone mailbox for all units <br />3) from the maximum driveway width of 12' at the front property line to a width of 20' <br />4) from the maximum allowed height for a decorative fence of 3' along front and side <br />property lines that face a primary street and 5' along the side and rear property lines to <br />allow a maximum 6' high solid decorative vinyl or wood fence, except within the 10' front <br />yard as shown <br />5) from the required maximum building setback of 10' to 25'; <br />6) to be allowed to have a covered porch and balcony to encroach into the required 6' <br />interior yard around buildings and be allowed to be as close as 5' to a front property line as <br />shown <br />State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met <br />before a variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows: <br />(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general <br />welfare of the community; <br />The proposed development variances have no impact on the public health, safety, and <br />general welfare of the community. <br />(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance <br />will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner; <br />With proper buffering and site design, the use and value of adjacent properties should not <br />be impacted. The additional setbacks along Twyckenham and the variations in the front <br />fagade will allow the property to better integrate in to the neighborhood and minimize the <br />impact on use and value of adjacent properties. <br />(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical <br />difficulties in the use of the property <br />APC # 2810 -16 Page 3 of 4 <br />