Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />i <br />4). To be allowed to have a covered porch and balcony to encroach into the required 6 ft. interior <br />yard around buildings up to 6 ft. as shown. This request is allow for covered porches or balconies to <br />be located in the interior yards around buildings up to the 6 ft. width of the yard area. A 6 ft. width for <br />a porch or balcony is a reasonable width. The ordinance allows a maximum encroachment of 5 ft. <br />which would tend to be too narrow for use and placement of chairs. This request would still keep the <br />location of the front covered porch or balcony no closer to the front property line than the required 10 <br />ft. Building Setback Line. This request would also allow for the same type of structures to be located <br />along the rear fagade of the shown buildings. The Petitioners do not believe approval of this request <br />will have a detrimental effect on any surrounding properties. <br />5). From the maximum allowed height for a decorative fence of 3 feet along front and side property <br />lines that face a primary street and 5 feet along the side and rear property lines to allow a maximum <br />of a 6 feet high solid decorative vinyl or wood fence, except within the 10 ft. front yard as shown. <br />This request from the NNZO design guidelines is due to the fact that there is a conflict between <br />the City zoning ordinances and the development standards in the NNZO Overlay district. The zoning <br />ordinance allows 6 ft. high fences, but the NNZO limits the height to 5 ft. The Petitioners would like <br />to have 6 ft. high screening fencing, which is the standard fence height in residential neighborhoods. <br />The proposed fencing would be a decorative type fence made out of vinyl or wood and placed as <br />shown along the north, east and south property lines. The one foot of additional height will provide a <br />little more screening between the proposed Townhomes and the existing single family homes to the <br />East and South of the project site. The Petitioners do not believe approval of this request will <br />adversely affect any surrounding property. <br />6). To be allowed to place a enclosed dumpster in the 25 ft. rear yard setback to a point no closer <br />than 7 ft. from the east property line as shown. The placement of the dumpster was done to make it as <br />accessible as possible and to still not be visible from the street. The dumpster will be in an enclosure <br />and will also be screened on three sides by evergreens. The Petitioners do not believe approval of this <br />request will have a detrimental effect on any surrounding properties. <br />The owners would ask the Commission members to agree that the approval of the above <br />requested Variances, will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of <br />the community and the use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will <br />not be affected in a substantially adverse manner; and, that the strict application of the terms of this <br />Ordinance would result in practical difficulties in the use of the property. <br />MAR <br />•, r,.1 w n ,r, r.� � l "1 <br />