Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT C <br />Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest with Various Forms of Compensation <br />The forms of compensation for municipal advisors vary according to the nature of the engagement and <br />requirements of the client, among other factors. Various forms of compensation present actual or <br />potential conflicts of interest because they may create an incentive for an advisor to recommend one <br />course of action over another if it is more beneficial to the advisor to do so. This exhibit discusses <br />various forms of compensation and the timing of payments to the advisors. <br />Fixed fee. Under a fixed fee form of compensation, the municipal advisor is paid a fixed amount <br />established at the outset of the transaction. The amount is usually based upon an analysis by the client and <br />the advisor of, among other things, the expected duration and complexity of the transaction and the <br />agreed -upon scope of work that the advisor will perform. This form of compensation presents a potential <br />conflict of interest because, if the transaction requires more work than originally contemplated, the <br />advisor may suffer a loss. Thus, the advisor may recommend less time-consuming alternatives, or fail to <br />do a thorough analysis of alternatives. There may be additional conflicts of interest if the municipal <br />advisor's fee is contingent upon the successful completion of a financing, as described below. <br />Hourly fee. Under an hourly fee form of compensation, the municipal advisor is paid an amount equal to <br />the number of hours worked by the advisor times an agreed -upon hourly billing rate. This form of <br />compensation presents a potential conflict of interest if the client and the advisor do not agree on a <br />reasonable maximum amount at the outset of the engagement, because the advisor does not have a <br />financial incentive to recommend alternatives that would result in fewer hours worked. In some cases, an <br />hourly fee may be applied against a retainer (e.g., a retainer payable monthly), in which case it is payable <br />whether or not a financing closes. Alternatively, it may be contingent upon the successful completion of a <br />financing, in which case there may be additional conflicts of interest, as described below. <br />Fee contingent upon the completion of a financing or other transaction. Under a contingent fee form <br />of compensation, payment of an advisor's fee is dependent upon the successful completion of a financing <br />or other transaction. This form of compensation presents a conflict because the advisor may have an <br />incentive to recommend unnecessary financings or financings that are disadvantageous to the client. For <br />example, when facts or circumstances arise that could cause the financing or other transaction to be <br />delayed or fail to close, an advisor may have an incentive to discourage a full consideration of such facts <br />and circumstances, or to discourage consideration of alternatives that may result in the cancellation of the <br />financing or other transaction. <br />Fee paid under a retainer agreement. Under a retainer agreement, fees are paid to a municipal advisor <br />periodically (e.g., monthly) and are not contingent upon the completion of a financing or other <br />transaction. Fees paid under a retainer agreement may be calculated on a fixed fee basis (e.g., a fixed fee <br />per month regardless of the number of hours worked) or an hourly basis (e.g., a minimum monthly <br />payment, with additional amounts payable if a certain number of hours worked is exceeded). A retainer <br />agreement does not present the conflicts associated with a contingent fee arrangement (described above). <br />Fee based upon principal or notional amount and term of transaction. Under this form of <br />compensation, the municipal advisor's fee is based upon a percentage of the principal amount of an issue <br />of securities (e.g., bonds) or, in the case of a derivative, the present value of or notional amount and term <br />of the derivative. This form of compensation presents a conflict of interest because the advisor may have <br />an incentive to advise the client to increase the size of the securities issue or modify the derivative for the <br />purpose of increasing the advisor's compensation. <br />