11-14-16 Zoning and Annexation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

evaluation of that. In 2015, we put forth an amendment to the PUD district and the standards that are established in the ordinance. We strengthened the intent, we removed the area requirement, added some procedural elements to it —but the main focus was that, if it could be achieved through the zoning district or variances or special exceptions through the Area Board of Zoning Appeals, it may not be appropriate for a PUD. Since we have passed that ordinance —we went back and looked at our records —this is the first PUD to be filed since then. We have a couple of PUDs that are in the packaged information that you have there: the Studebaker and Hickory Road PUD. Committeemember Jo Broden asked if Ms. Smith could detail the PUD process for the knowledge of the Committee and the public, as well as explain why the Council has changed from allowing them to making their criteria stricter. Ms. Smith responded, What makes a PUD, Planned Unit Development district different is that, essentially, they write their own zoning guidelines. So, they write their own development standards for their particular development. Because these are very expensive projects and require a lot of review time, prior to the change, there was a Concept Review. So, prior to filing, we asked petitioners to meet with the staff at least ten (10) days prior, to give us some lead time so we could start looking at the project, the development standards, what the issues might be, give us more time to review it— because they often require a much lengthier process compared to the typical rezoning. When they file, they file for a zoning map, as you would for any zoning. But then they're required to file an ordinance —which gives us all the development standards —and a site plan —which is just a tentative plan—and then any other information we ask for along the way. Sometimes we might ask for building elevations, or other such information. That all then gets presented to the Area Plan Commission, then comes before the Council for approval. The secondary portion of it is where it gets into the specific details. The first stage the preliminary phase, which is where we are right now —is all essentially conceptual. It's not until the secondary approval that we get into the specifics. Once the project has preliminary approval, and we finalize all those documents and capture anything that was presented in any public hearing, into that we have a final submittal in which they have to incorporate any changes that were presented at the public hearing into this district ordinance. So, if they agreed to a certain setback change or an area requirement, we make sure that those get incorporated into that secondary approval. Anything that gets presented at a public hearing becomes a part of their district ordinance. Then, we review any plans that are submitted to make sure they meet all the development standards that they have established for themselves. If they meet the standards, they can go across the street and apply for a building permit. If they don't meet the standards, then we have to go back and figure out if it's a major change or a minor change and, depending on what that is, it ends up back to the Council. That's part of why Council, over the years, has been very particular about what they're willing to see as a minor change. Anything that adds a use, changes a setback, increases parking requirements— there's a whole list of things that bump it into a major change. Then you have to apply for a whole new ordinance again. One of the thoughts of the changing PUD was not to make people continually do this process. With a PUD there's a lot more babysitting of the project. We have to do a lot more monitoring, back and forth. So that was one of the things that came up. The other was the Council's not wanting to be too detailed, I think. 3