My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Alley Vacations - Tony Halsey - Kite Realty Group
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2017
>
Licenses and Permits
>
Alley Vacations - Tony Halsey - Kite Realty Group
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2025 3:15:05 PM
Creation date
2/16/2017 1:04:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Vacations
Document Date
2/14/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br />a <br />INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />DATE SENT: 1/23/2017 <br />Pete Kaminski, Street Department <br />,/Mike Bronstetter, Solid Waste <br />att Longfellow, Engineering Department <br />Chris Dressel, Community Investment <br />Federico Rodriguez, Fire Department <br />Larry Magliozzi, Area Plan Commission (Imaglioz(a)co.st- <br />'ose h.in.us or 235-9813 fax) <br />Gene Eyster, Police Department <br />Phil Griffin, NIPSCO (pmpriffin annisource.com) (FYI Only) <br />Linda M. Martin, OR Clerku <br />REQUEST FRECOMMENDATION — STREET/ALLEY <br />VACATION <br />APPLICANT: Tony Halsey — Kite Realty Group <br />N/S Alley S of St Vincent St. East of Eddy St., including (2) <br />LOCATION: E/W Alleys North of Howard St. South of St. Vincent St. <br />and previously non -vacated right-of-way West of SR 23 at <br />the South End of Former Georgiana St. <br />DATE DUE: February 7, 2016 <br />FAX OR E-MAIL TO: 235-9171 / Imartin(&southbendin.gov <br />PLEASE MAKE YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING <br />IC 36-7-3-13 CRITERIA: <br />1. The vacation would/would not hinder the growth or orderly development of the <br />unit or neighborhood in which it is located or to which it is contiguous. <br />2. The vacation would/would not make access to the lands of the aggrieved person <br />by means of public way difficult or inconvenient. <br />3. The vacation would/would not hinder the public's access to a church, school or <br />other public building or place. <br />4. The vacation would/would not hinder the use of a public right-of-way by the <br />neighborhood in which it is located or to which it is contiguous. <br />COMMENTS: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.