11-28-16 Zoning and Annexation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mike Danch, Danch Hamer & Associates, 1643 Commerce Drive, South Bend, IN, confirmed that that was correct. Ms. Smith continued, explaining that some of it is being handled by the Area Plan Commission, and the rest by NENC and NNRO. Committeemember John Voorde walked up to the site plan and stated, You've got three (3) in a tier, here and here. These are fourteen (14) foot alleys. Where are the garage places going to be? Ms. Smith approached the site plan as well, pointing out where the garages would be and showing Committeemember Voorde other aspects of the plan. There was discussion about the fact that paving was required. Committeemember Broden asked, And what about to the west, there's a Single - Family home — what type of screening requirements are on that side of the lots? Ms. Smith responded, Actually, to the north and to the west are both Single - Family homes. The requirements along this area are type A or 1 in the city: one (1) tree every forty (40) feet. That's required along the perimeter of any portion of the [ ?] that's not containing improvements. Committeemember Voorde asked about paving on a particular corner of the site plan. Mr. Danch responded, Yeah, we're going to have to have the site plan approved by the Engineering Department and announced by the Billing Department. So what they'll end up doing is, they're going to have like a forty -five (45) cut there, because if there's trash trucks or cars going through there - Committeemember Voorde interjected, Or if there are ambulances... At this point, Committee Chair Oliver Davis asked Mr. Danch to introduce himself, and he did so as well as introduce Anthony Zappia, the petitioner's attorney. Mr. Danch returned to the discussion with Committeemember Voorde, stating, We have to handle drainage and those issues with City Engineering as part of that. And that's the reason for that requirement for the pavement for both of those alleys, so that cars would only access pavement. So, between Corby and Lawrence into those alleys. Committeemember Broden asked, That entire length of that alley that's to the north of the property as well as the entire length to the west? Mr. Danch responded, Anything that's adjacent to our property... would have to be paved. It would be access for them to get out to Lawrence or down to Corby. If anybody wanted to go farther north or to the west, that's up to either the City or any new development that would go there, but then the City would require those people to do pavement and bring the ordinance up to standard. 0