My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-16 Zoning and Annexation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
Zoning and Annexation
>
11-28-16 Zoning and Annexation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 3:41:41 PM
Creation date
2/9/2017 11:11:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
11/28/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Brian Pawlowski, Department of Community Investment, with offices on the 14th Floor of the <br />County -City Building, stated that the Department of Community Investment has engaged with an <br />outside local firm to work with Dave Matthews and look at his project again and propose <br />alternative design schemes or other adjustments to the project. <br />Councilmember Karen White asked, After the developer and others have met, are you confident <br />that by December 12, 2016 we'll be able to take action at that time? <br />Mr. Pawlowski responded, I think the short version is that we don't have a lot of choice. We're <br />going to be sure to be available. The one (1) thing I think could present a challenge would be just <br />actual cross - destinations of getting them to as specific a point as possible. That will be the key <br />part. But the quicker we can get an overall kind of design conception —or at least a meeting <br />between the developer and his folks, and the group the quicker that will come. I'm sure there <br />will be alternatives or at least there will be comments from this outside group that they can <br />present, both to Dave and to the Administration. Going through all that will encapsulate some of <br />the concerns I think that have been voiced. The key question then will be, "What do we do with <br />that information ?" Without knowing what they're going to end up proposing, I wouldn't want to <br />speak too much beyond that. But yes, short version: we're shooting to make sure that you have <br />an alternative that you can see prior to that meeting. <br />Committeemember Davis asked if the first meeting had already been scheduled. <br />Mr. Pawlowski responded, They'll be contacted today. <br />Committeemember Davis responded, I appreciate that. As soon you hear something, I would <br />request sending it to us– especially to Councilmember Broden —so we can look at what their <br />corrections are. I understand the whole thing about open -door law and everything else like that, <br />so we have to be careful about having any other kind of meetings prior to that. But if there's <br />some key issues that she has, you can have a contact number so that Councilmembers can call in <br />and get some better understanding maybe visually, or whatever, so we can come up with a clear <br />issue of where to go from this. <br />Mr. Pawlowski responded, I would anticipate, probably this week, for work to maybe bleed into <br />next week, but next week I would assume being able to contact you all. We're trying to give <br />them access to all the different documentation that you all compiled, which would include public <br />comment, all the letters, the different subs. <br />Committeemember Davis asked, Would you foresee any reason why they may come back and <br />say, "We can't make any kind of statement or anything like that? ' Do you see any reason why <br />they won't make any kind of recommendation? <br />Mr. Pawlowski responded, It's possible that they may say they don't see alternative options, but I <br />do not do that line of work, so I would hate to speculate on it. But I think there will be <br />suggestions, certainly. How far those go with the developers, that's going to be the key question. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.