My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-16 Health and Public Safety
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
Health and Public Safety
>
11-28-16 Health and Public Safety
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 3:42:27 PM
Creation date
2/3/2017 12:05:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
11/28/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
there were "straw sales." He explained that a property owner would sell his property to someone <br />until his nuisance status had cleared and then just buy it back afterward, and so dodge any <br />penalties. He stated that the team has been excellent at working with owners to solve these <br />problems before they have a chance of having their properties added to the Chronic Nuisance <br />List. <br />Committeemember Broden asked, And that's online that you can check on nuisance properties? <br />Councilmember Scott responded, Right. <br />Committeemember Broden asked, Is there anything, though —with regard to transferred papers — <br />if there is a sale? Similar to if I have water in my basement, I have to make that disclosure that <br />my property has chronic problems with water. Is there anything within our documentation, <br />relative to sales— <br />Officer Lane interjected, We've only had one (1) time where that occurred and it was at Miami <br />Hills, actually. They were actually a designated nuisance property, at the time. The owner <br />decided to sell the property, so I did an educational component with the prospective owner. I told <br />him, "Sir, just so you're aware, this is currently designated under Nuisance Property." I <br />explained it to him. I sent him a copy of our ordinance that we have online. He moved forward <br />with the property, understanding that there might be fines involved. And, actually, there were <br />fines involved. And, actually, the new owner paid their fines. So, it was very smooth and it <br />worked out great. <br />Committeemember Broden asked how the law that protects anyone who might be engaging in <br />illegal drinking or drug use that calls 911 to help save someone else who is overdosing or <br />alcohol - poisoned, etc, falls within this ordinance. <br />Officer Lane responded that in a scenario like that, they would be protected. He stated, Our <br />ultimate goal is to solve problems. If someone has an alcoholic problem, our ultimate goal is to <br />give that person help. We are not going to a landlord or owner saying, "Hey, here's the problem, <br />and you need to evict." It's not about eviction. There are a lot of ways to solve the problem. <br />Committeemember Broden asked if that then falls under the ordinance's "no victims of crime" <br />rule. <br />Ms. Colborn responded, Officer Lane does review all these individually, so before any of them <br />are even verified as a valid complaint. We do have that extra layer scrutiny with them. <br />Committeemember Broden asked if reports on an annual basis have worked well and if <br />adjustments needed to be made. <br />Councilmember Scott responded, We're on adjustments. So, we did have meetings six (6) <br />months in a year into this. We have kind of let it go this past year. We did come back up with <br />these improvements. There is a list online of nuisance properties for public view. Keenan, I <br />believe, did a report in June. There was a report filed on how everything is going. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.