My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-05-16 Health and Public Safety
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
Health and Public Safety
>
10-05-16 Health and Public Safety
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 3:44:33 PM
Creation date
1/24/2017 11:31:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
10/5/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Agostino stated a simple way to think about that is to say you have three (3) police <br />departments operating who will want probably two (2) dispatchers each which is a bare <br />minimum. There's six (6) dispatchers. The fire departments are not asking for quite as many but <br />they in total need four (4) or five (5). That puts you at ten (10). Then you have the call takers to <br />take the calls before they get assigned to wherever they are going. Then we are at a minimum of <br />fourteen (14) or fifteen (15) people per shift. If you build from the bottom up like that, it is <br />simple math and you are over the number they originally allocated. It is hard to tell a person in <br />charge of a police of fire department that they are not going to get the dispatchers they need to do <br />their jobs. There are some nights where the City needs ten (10) or twelve (12) at one (1) time. <br />Vice Committee Chair White stated she knows they were mandated by the State to have two (2) <br />centers and South Bend could be the backup. She stated this originally was supposed to increase <br />efficiency and create better service, but we don't know if that has happened yet. She asked as of <br />now, what have we gained. That is important for us as individuals who must take action on the <br />budget, but also we interact with our constituents. <br />Mr. Croymans responded it is no secret that the State made a mandate without giving you any <br />funding mechanisms. The things that you do benefit from with the combined center is the use of <br />the equipment. For example, if you had to buy a 911 telephone recorder it is about a quarter of a <br />million dollars. If you had South Bend, the Sheriff, Mishawaka, and Clay all buying (1) that is a <br />million dollars where the total could have just been $250,000. The money that is truly saved is <br />going to be on the technology side. The human element is really something that you can't get <br />savings from. <br />County Council President Rafael Morton stated he never stopped and looked at it like that. <br />Because of the mandate and that we had to update the equipment, he will reluctantly agree that <br />there is cost savings in that arena. <br />Mr. Agostino stated you do also have some efficiencies in terms of the administrative side <br />regarding personnel. You are not going to somehow answer more calls with less people, you <br />can't do it. <br />Council President Scott stated your people are always going to be the most expensive thing in the <br />operation. <br />Vice Committee Chair White asked Mr. Murphy how much is being asked for from the City. <br />Mr. Murphy stated he was going to ask that himself. We had an estimate back on September 2 nd <br />� <br />2016 and that was a little over $2 million. We have to find out if that still is what the request is. <br />Mr. Agostino stated we are waiting on some financial advisor numbers to give us hard numbers <br />we need. The estimates range from $2.1 million to $2.4 million from the City of South Bend. <br />The County has $3.4 to $3.8 million. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.