Laserfiche WebLink
MEN <br />SPECIAL MEETING <br />FEBRUARY 26, 1975 <br />is planned... Mr. Wells said detailed plans for the project are <br />available for inspection by any interested property owners after <br />this meeting. Preliminary assessment rolls showing the.cost <br />per property owner for the project were then distributed to those <br />present. Mr. Wells indicated that the construction would include <br />a tap to each property line and they would make every effort to <br />place the taps where the owners wanted them. From the.sewer tap <br />at the property line to the house, it would be the property owner's <br />responsibility to pay the cost. That cost presently is about <br />$6.00 a foot. <br />Mr. Farrand said the Board would answer any questions. Mr. Price, <br />2617 W. Fairview, owner of Lots 84, 85 and 86, said the project was <br />knocked down once by a petition of the property owners and he asked <br />why it was being considered again. Mr. Farrand said the Board of <br />Public Works had been requested to conduct the public hearing and the <br />purpose of the hearing was to get the .views of the affected property <br />owners. Mr. Price asked if the matter would be brought up again <br />each time someone inquired about it. Mr. Farrand said no. <br />Mr. Ronald Nace, 2642 Victoria Street, asked what percentage of the <br />people had asked for the,pub.lic hearing. Mr. Farrand said the <br />number does not matter. He said one person can initiate a hearing on <br />a project. <br />Mr. Funk, 1608 Oliver Street, owner of Lots 28, 29 and 30, said <br />the part of Ewing Avenue included in the project is not in existence <br />at this time and he asked who would pay for the paving of the street. <br />Mr. Wells said the pavement would be part of the total project. <br />Mr. Dan Walkowiak, 1020 N. Sheridan, owner of Lots 349, 350, 351 <br />and 352 said he has not even been able to find his lots. He was <br />advised to check the plans after the meeting. <br />Mr. Price, 2617 W. Fairview, asked what the sewage charge would be <br />if this project went in,and, also, the water charge. Mr. Farrand <br />said, for those who do not have waterbills, the charge would be the <br />minimum of $3.40 a month. He said those who have City water would <br />be charged on the basis of water consumption. <br />Mr. Chadwick, 2722 Fairview, asked what area the sewer construction <br />was mandated in in 1970. Mr. Wells answered that this was the Beale <br />Street Sewer, west of Riverside Drive. Mr. Chadwick inquired how <br />close to a septic system a water system could be installed. He was <br />advised that these regulations change and are covered in the zoning <br />regulations. <br />Mr. Ed Nowak, 2407 S. Meade Street, said he felt that when the area <br />was annexed, the City got the opportunity to do what it pleased. <br />He said, under the State Statutes of Indiana with respect to sewers, <br />if the City wanted to it could put them in whether they were needed <br />or not. <br />Mr. Farrand said the project will not be built if more than 50% of <br />the property owners remonstrate against the -.sewer ponstruction. <br />