My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/20/74 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1974
>
05/20/74 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:42:12 PM
Creation date
11/23/2016 2:11:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
5/20/1974
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9T <br />REGULAR MEETING MAY 20, 1974 <br />ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO...9.,.1974 <br />CITY OWNED PROPERTY <br />STREET ADDRESS DEED NO. <br />702 South Clinton Street 649-A & B <br />1809 Florence Avenue 709 <br />602 West LaSalle Avenue 660 <br />701 South Marietta Street 542 <br />612 East Ohio Street 507 <br />1611 South William Street 621 <br />REPORT FROM LEGAL DEPARTMENT RE: 917 NORTH HILL <br />The <br />Board had <br />requested a report from the Legal Department regarding <br />Q <br />the <br />sale of a <br />city -owned lot at 917 N. <br />Hill Street to Charles Howell. <br />cc <br />Mr. <br />Howell had <br />informed the Board that <br />he was mistaken in what he <br />thought he was <br />purchasing and asked the <br />Board to review the matter. <br />The <br />following <br />report was received from <br />the Legal Department: <br />May 20, 1974 <br />To: Board of Public Works <br />From: James A. Roemer <br />Subject: 917 N. Hill <br />The sale of the above property has been reviewed and found to <br />be a binding and final transaction that should not be altered <br />or modified in any way. <br />This conclusion is supported by the facts and applicable law. <br />The notice of bids and other information issued by the City <br />was accurate and in no way tended to misrepresent the facts to <br />a prospective offeror. In short, the bidder was supplied with <br />all reasonable date to know what he was purchasing and thus <br />he.must be charged by law with making a knowing and intelligent <br />offer to the City. <br />When the negligence of the offeror results in a unilateral mistake <br />which fails to give notice to the offeree equity will generally <br />refuse relief. This principal is further supported and required when <br />it is placed in the context of the public contract and the bidding <br />process used to protect and insure the public interest. If, after <br />acceptance of a bid, rescission or modification of the contract was <br />allowed because of negligent error by the offeror, the entire <br />competitive bidding process would be reduced by a common <br />denominator of mistake or excuse and the desired finality of a sale <br />would be seriously jeopardized. The Board of Public Works should <br />not allow this to happen. <br />s/ James A. Roemer <br />City Attorney <br />Mr. Roemer said that basically Mr. Howell had bid on the property as <br />it was advertised and appraised, and he was awarded the sale of the <br />property. He said it was his opinion that the Board could take no <br />further action on the matter. Upon motion made, seconded and carried, <br />the recommendation was accepted and Mr. Howell is to be notified that <br />any further questions can be directed to the City Attorney's office. <br />STREET LIGHT OUTAGE REPORT FILED <br />The Street Light Outage Report for the period of May 7 to May 10 <br />was received and, upon motion made, seconded and carried, was ordered <br />filed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.