Laserfiche WebLink
35� <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />JULY 12, 1976 <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Public Works was convened at <br />9:30 a.m, on Monday, July 12, 1976 by President Rollin Farrand. <br />with Mr. Farrand, 11r. Brunner and Mr. Mullen present. Deputy City <br />Attorney Georgia Luks was also present. <br />MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING APPROVED <br />Mr. Brunner reported that the minutes of the meeting.of July 6 had <br />been reviewed and he made a motion that they be approved as submitted. <br />Mr. Farrand seconded the motion and it carried. <br />HEARING ON FENCE ENCROACHMENT AT 807 NORTH OLIVE <br />Mr. Farrand advised the Board that the matter of a fence encroaching <br />on the city right-of-way at 807 N.,Olive Street was before the Board <br />last fall. At that time, the Attorney for the petitioner submitted to <br />the Board pictures of other alleged violations and asked that the <br />Board allow the fence to remain. Mr. Farrand then noted that he had <br />recommended to the Board on June 28, 1976 that the property owner, <br />Benedict Leyba, and his Attorney, Jack C. Dunfee, Jr., be notified <br />that the matter would be publicly discussed at the meeting today. <br />Mr. Farrand reviewed the previous actions on this matter and said <br />that the Board of Public Works had determined that there was an <br />encroachment on the public right-of-way at 807 N. Olive Street and <br />concurred with a complaint that the fence did restrict sight distance <br />and impose a safety hazard at the intersection of Olive and Prast. <br />Mr. Dunfee, Attorney for the: owner, had called the attention of the <br />Board to other sites in the City where the same kind of encroachment <br />was alleged to exist and the Board took: the matter.under advisement <br />to investigate the charges. The City did investigate many of the <br />sites pictured in Mr. Dunfee's petition and has determined that, <br />in large part, these are sites where the property owner is, in fact, <br />on his own property. Mr. Farrand said the City has sent seven <br />letters to property owners with encroachment situations like this one <br />asking them to remove encroachments. Mr. Farrand then noted that <br />Attorney Jack Dunfee was present. Mr. Dunfee introduced himself and <br />said that Mr. Benedict Leyba, owner of the property at 807 N. Olive, <br />was also present. Mr. Dunfee said this matter was brought up in <br />September, 1975. There was one complaint regarding the fence encroach- <br />ing on the public right-of-way. Mr. Farrand wrote a letter to Mr. <br />Leyba asking him to remove the fence. Mr. Leyba then retained Mr. <br />Dunfee to represent him in this matter. Mr. Dunfee filed a petition <br />with the Board on October 30, 1975 asking that the fence be allowed to <br />remain and said it was his understanding that no action was taken on his <br />petition pending further investigation. Mr. Dunfee said there is no <br />indication that this fence is a_traff_ic problem. He said there are <br />other such fences on the public right-of-way and he had assumed that the <br />City would take a position on all such matters and a decision would be <br />made. Mr. Dunfee said, to his knowledge, there is no one complaining <br />about the fence now. The fence has been up for ten months and there <br />have been no accidents. He said.there is no evidence that there is a <br />safety hazard caused by the fence. Mr. Dunfee called the Board's <br />attention to the fence constructed at Central High School, at the <br />corner of William and Washington, which also extends out to the <br />sidewalk line and asked if that fence was a safety hazard and why it <br />has not been ordered removed. Mr. Dunfee told the Board that he had <br />spent one hour driving around the City and had taken photographs <br />of many fences and hedges on the right-of-way and up to the sidewalk <br />line in various locations around the City. He said those photographs <br />were submitted to the Board. Mr. Dunfee said there are only two <br />reasons to order the fence removed; (1) if it is a safety hazard and <br />(2) if it encroaches on the:City right-of-way. Mr. Dunfee said, if <br />the City takes that position, it will have to order all fences, hedges, <br />trees, etc. from parkways all over the City. Mr. Farrand said a permit <br />from the Park Department is required both to plant or remove trees and <br />shrubs from the parkway. Mr. Dunfee said he knows this is not done by <br />most property owners. Mr. Farrand said the fact that it is not done <br />1 <br />1 <br />